European Roma Rights v Immigration Officer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE WARD,LORD JUSTICE LAWS,Lord Justice Simon Brown
Judgment Date20 May 2003
Neutral Citation[2003] EWCA Civ 666,[2003] EWCA Civ 60
Docket NumberC1/2002/2183(A),Case No: C1/2002/2183/QBACF
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date20 May 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • NS v Judge Anderson and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 18 November 2004
    ...COURT & ORS 2002 3 IR 97 2001 13 3618 CONSTITUTION ART 29.6 R (EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS) v IMMIGRATION OFFICER AT PRAGUE AIRPORT (CA) 2004 2 WLR 147 2004 QB 811 CONSTITUTION ART 29 O LAIGHLEIS, IN RE 1960 IR 93 CONSTITUTION ART 30.3 EVISTON v DPP 2002 3 IR 260 DOHERTY v GOVERNOR OF PORTLAOISE ......
  • R (Pepushi) v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 May 2004
    ...UKHL 12; [2004] 1 WLR 807 R (on the application of European Roma Rights Centre and others) v Immigration Officer, Prague AirportUNK [2003] EWCA Civ 666; [2003] INLR 374 R (on the application of Pretty) v Director of Public ProsecutionsUNKELR [2001] UKHL 61; [2002] 1 AC 800 R (on the applica......
  • Sun Myung Moon v Entry Clearance Officer, Seoul
    • United Kingdom
    • Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
    • 30 June 2005
    ...to access a country for the purpose of making a claim; European Roma Rights Centre v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport and SSHDUNK [2003] EWCA Civ 666, [2003] INLR 374. 39. Fourth, we do not accept the submission that the obligation on the Entry Clearance Officer under paragraph 2 of th......
  • JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Igor Valeryevich Kolomoisky
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 October 2019
    ...do we consider that the application of the Lugano Convention by analogy somehow subverts the principles enunciated by Lord Bingham in the Roma Rights case. The application of articles 22 and 23 or 27 and 28 of the Lugano Convention by analogy to cases involving potential or actual proceedin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Using International Law in Canadian Courts. Second Edition
    • 16 June 2008
    ...12 Co. Rep. 63, 77 ER 1342 (KB) .......................... 92 R (European Roma Rights Centre) v. Immigration Oicer at Prague Airport [2004] QB 811 (Eng CA) .............................................................. 309 R. v. Bow Street Magistrate, Ex parte Pinochet (No 3) [2000] 1 AC 14......
  • International law and administrative decisions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Using International Law in Canadian Courts. Second Edition
    • 16 June 2008
    ...(2002) 58 OR (3d) 107 at paras. 50–57 and 98. 86 For example, R (European Roma Rights Centre) v. Immigration Oicer at Prague Airport [2004] QB 811 (Eng CA). 87 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Afairs, ex parte Lam (2003) 195 CLR 502 (HCA). 88 Above note 15. 89 Ibid . at para. 2......
  • Treating like alike: the principle of nondiscrimination as a tool to mandate the equal treatment of refugees and beneficiaries of complementary protection.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...365. As authority for this point, Hathaway refers to the case of R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] QB 811, 824-5 [37], 827-8 [43] (Simon Brown LJ), cited in ibid 353 n 6. See also James C Hathaway, "Why Refugee Law Still Matters' (2007) 8 Melbour......
  • An Attempt to Evade Liability: Australia's Role in Detention Center Abuse and the Refoulement of Sri Lankan Asylum Seekers in the Context of the Convention Against Torture
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law No. 45-3, 2017
    • Invalid date
    ...No. 51/96, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95, doc. 7 rev. (March 1997)). See also European Roma Rights Centre v. Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2003] EWCA Civ. 666 (20 May 2003) [34]; CPFC v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (arguing that "the non-refoulement obligations arising from ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT