Hamzeh Malas & Sons v British Impex Industries Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE JENKINS,LORD JUSTICE SELLERS,LORD JUSTICE PEARCE |
| Judgment Date | 10 December 1957 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1957] EWCA Civ J1210-3 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 10 December 1957 |
[1957] EWCA Civ J1210-3
Lord Justice Jenkins
Lord Justice Sellers And
Lord Justice Pearce.
In The Supreme Court of Judicature
Court of Appeal
MR GERALD GARDINER Q.C. and MR J. FOX-ANDREWS (instructed by Messrs Simmons & Simmons) appeared on behalf of the Appellants (Plaintiffs below).
MR A.A. MOCATTA, Q.C. and MR FRANK LITTMAN (instructed by Messrs Menasse & Tobin) appeared on behalf of the Respondents (Defendants below).
In this case the Plaintiffs are a Jordanian firm who agreed to buy from the Defendants, a British company, a quantity of reinforced steel rods. These steel rods were to be delivered in two instalments and payment was to be effected by the opening in favour of the Defendants of two confirmed letters of credit with the Midland Bank Limited in London, one in respect of each instalment. The letters of credit were duly opened. The first has been realised by the Defendant vendors, and they are on the point of realising the second. This application is concerned with the second letter of credit.
It appears that when the first consignment of steel rods arrived they were, according to the Plaintiffs, by no means up to contract quality and many criticisms were made on that score. That is a matter in issue between the parties.
In the meantime the Plaintiffs wish to secure themselves in respect of any damages they may be found to be entitled to when this dispute is ultimately tried out, by preventing the Defendants from dealing with this outstanding letter of credit, Mr Gardiner in effect treats this as no more than part of the price, a cum earmarked to pay for the goods bought under the contract, which the Plaintiffs have become entitled to repudiate; and he gays that the Defendants ought, accordingly, to be restrained from dealing with the amount of this letter of credit. He points out that he is not seeking any order against the Bank, but merely against the Defendants.
We have been referred to a number of authorities, and it seems to be plain enough that the opening of a confirmed letter of credit constitutes a bargain between the banker and the vendor of the goods, which imposes upon the banker an absolute obligation to pay, irrespective of any dispute there may be between the parties as to whether the goods are up to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lambias (Importers & Exporters) Co Pte Ltd v Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation
...cited by the plaintiffs, viz Discount Records Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd & Anor [1975] 1 WLR 315 Hamzeh Malas v British Imex Industries [1958] 2 QB 127 Bolivinter Oil SA v Chase Manhattan Bank [1984] 1 Lloyd`s 251 and Edward Owen Engineering Co Ltd v Barclays Bank International Ltd [1978] QB 1......
- Ngui Mui Khin v Gillespie Bros & Company Ltd
-
Owen (Edward) Engineering Ltd v Barclays Bank International Ltd
...buyer and seller must be settled between themselves. The bank must honour the credit. That was clearly stated in Hamzeh Malas & Sons v. British Imex Industries Ltd. (1958) 2 Queen's Bench 127 at page 129. Lord Justice Jenkins, giving the judgment of this court, said: "… it seems to be plai......
- Chua Teng Hwee trading as Rexson & Co; Overseas Union Bank Ltd
-
Initiatives of the International Chamber of Commerce to Prevent Fraudulent Calls on Demand Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit
...the Guarantor?’ (1996) 5 Journalof International Banking Law 210 at 210. See also Hamzeh Malas and Sons v British Imex Industries Ltd[1958] 2 QB 127 (CA); Howe Richardson Scale Co Ltd v Polimex-Cekop and National Westminster BankLtd [1978] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 161 (CA); R D Harbottle (Mercantile) ......
-
The implementation of the fraud exception rule: a comparative study
...v Barclays Bank International Ltd [1978] QB 172.17. Edward Owen Engineering (n15) 981; Hamzeh Malas & Sons v British Imex Industries Ltd [1958]2 QB 127 (CA) 129; Stein v Hambro’s Bank of Northern Commerce [1921] 9 Ll L Rep. 507, 529.18. Hamzeh Malas (n17) 129.19. RD Harbottle (Mercantile) L......