Hubbard v Vosper
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | THE MASTER of THE ROLLS,LORD JUSTICE MEGAW,LORD JUSTICE STEPHENSON,LORD JUSTICE SALMON,LORD JUSTICE STAMP |
Judgment Date | 19 November 1971 |
Neutral Citation | [1971] EWCA Civ J1119-4 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1971] EWCA Civ J1119-1 |
Date | 19 November 1971 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
181 cases
-
Charlton v HH The Aga Khan’s Studs Société Civile
... ... Citations: HUBBARD V VOSPER 1972 1 AER 1023 HALSBURYS LAWS OF ENGLAND 4ED V16 PARA 24 FENNELLY V ASSICURIZONI GENERALI SPA 1985 3 ILTR 73 ... ...
- Shamsudin bin Shaik Jamaludin v Kenwood Electronics
- Kenwood Electronics Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd; Shamsudin bin Shaik Jamaludin
- Chia Ngen Yiok; Wah Loong (Jelapang) Tin Mine Sdn Bhd
Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
-
THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF FAIR DEALING
...than others, with the consequence that fair use is more difficult to establish when the former works are copied. 65 Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84 at 94; De Garis v Neville Jeffress Pidler Pty Ltd(1990) 18 IPR 292 at 302; Associated Newspapers Group plc v News Group Newspapers[1986] RPC 51......
-
RESTRAINING A CALL ON A PERFORMANCE BOND: SHOULD ‘FRAUD OR UNCONSCIONABILITY’ BE THE NEW ORTHODOXY?
...As to the meaning of ‘status quo’, refer to Garden Cottage Foods Ltd v Milk Marketing Board[1984] AC 130, at 140. 84 Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84, at 98. 85 Other instances where American Cyanamid is regarded as inapplicable are, inter alia, when: (a) the injunction sought is mandatory i......
-
A LOOK BACK AT PUBLIC POLICY, THE LEGISLATURE, THE COURTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN SINGAPORE
...more open interpretation, given the important role of these defences in protecting the public interest. See, for example, Hubbard v Vosper[1972] 2 QB 84; Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd[1975] 1 QB 613; Time-Warner Entertainments Co LP v Channel Four Television Corp p......
-
'A real pea souper': the Panel Case and the development of the fair dealing defences to copyright infringement in Australia.
...commonly some work of recent appearance; a critique ...' In my opinion, 'review' is used in s 41 in this sense. (27) Ibid 109-10. (28) [1972] 2 QB 84. (29) The Panel Trial (2001) 108 FCR 235, 276, (30) (1999) 48 IPR 333 ('Nine v ABC). (31) Ibid 340. (32) [1973] 1 All ER 241. (33) [1992] Ch ......
Request a trial to view additional results