Hubbard v Vosper

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeTHE MASTER of THE ROLLS,LORD JUSTICE MEGAW,LORD JUSTICE STEPHENSON,LORD JUSTICE SALMON,LORD JUSTICE STAMP
Judgment Date19 November 1971
Neutral Citation[1971] EWCA Civ J1119-4
Judgment citation (vLex)[1971] EWCA Civ J1119-1
Date19 November 1971
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
181 cases
12 books & journal articles
  • THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF FAIR DEALING
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...than others, with the consequence that fair use is more difficult to establish when the former works are copied. 65 Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84 at 94; De Garis v Neville Jeffress Pidler Pty Ltd(1990) 18 IPR 292 at 302; Associated Newspapers Group plc v News Group Newspapers[1986] RPC 51......
  • RESTRAINING A CALL ON A PERFORMANCE BOND: SHOULD ‘FRAUD OR UNCONSCIONABILITY’ BE THE NEW ORTHODOXY?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...As to the meaning of ‘status quo’, refer to Garden Cottage Foods Ltd v Milk Marketing Board[1984] AC 130, at 140. 84 Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84, at 98. 85 Other instances where American Cyanamid is regarded as inapplicable are, inter alia, when: (a) the injunction sought is mandatory i......
  • A LOOK BACK AT PUBLIC POLICY, THE LEGISLATURE, THE COURTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...more open interpretation, given the important role of these defences in protecting the public interest. See, for example, Hubbard v Vosper[1972] 2 QB 84; Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd[1975] 1 QB 613; Time-Warner Entertainments Co LP v Channel Four Television Corp p......
  • 'A real pea souper': the Panel Case and the development of the fair dealing defences to copyright infringement in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 27 No. 2, August 2003
    • 1 August 2003
    ...commonly some work of recent appearance; a critique ...' In my opinion, 'review' is used in s 41 in this sense. (27) Ibid 109-10. (28) [1972] 2 QB 84. (29) The Panel Trial (2001) 108 FCR 235, 276, (30) (1999) 48 IPR 333 ('Nine v ABC). (31) Ibid 340. (32) [1973] 1 All ER 241. (33) [1992] Ch ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT