Local Government Board v Arlidge
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 20 July 1914 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1914] UKHL J0720-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 20 July 1914 |
[1914] UKHL J0720-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Monday the 15th, as Tuesday the 16th, and Thursday the 18th, days of June last, upon the Petition and Appeal of the Local Government Board, whose offices are at Whitehall, in the County of London, praying, that the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 16th of October 1913, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of William Arlidge, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 16th day of October 1913, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Reversed, and that the Order of the King's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice, of the 18th day of December 1912, thereby Reversed, be, and the same is hereby, Restored: And it is further Ordered, That the Respondent do pay, or cause to be paid, to the said Appellants the Costs incurred by them in the Courts below, and also the Costs incurred by them in respect of the said Appeal to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Ghazi bin Mohd Sawi v Mohd Haniff bin Omar, Ketua Polis Negara, Malaysia and Another
-
Smith v Police Commissioner
...All E.R. Rep. 78. (26) Liversidge v. Anderson, [1942] A.C. 206; [1941] 3 All E.R. 338, considered. (27) Local Govt. Bd. v. Arlidge, [1915] A.C. 120; [1914–15] All E.R. Rep. 1, followed. (28) McInnes v. Onslow Fane, [1978] 1 W.L.R. 1520; [1978] 3 All E.R. 211, followed. (29) Martineau v. Mat......
-
The State (Horgan) v Exported Live Stock Insurance Board
... ... in Local Government Board v. Arlidge [1915] A. C. at p. 133 .) Certiorari and Mandamus ... ...
-
R v Thames Magistrates' Court, ex parte Polemis
... ... 1375A–D) ... Dictum of Viscount Haldane L.C. in Local Government Board v. Arlidge [1915] A.C. 120, 132, H.L.(E.). applied ... ...
-
Preliminary Sections
...Ltd. [1964] A.C. 234, H.L.; [1913] All E.R. 151. 28 Lewis v. Lewis (1958) 1 All E.R. 859. 330 Local Government Board v. Alridge (1915) A.C. 120, 132; 84. L.J.K.B. 72; 30 T.L.R. 672. 60 M. & M. [1928] P. 123; 44 T.L.R. 299. 46 Mabro v. Eagle Star & British Dominions Insurance Co. Ltd. (1932)......
-
Cases referred to in 1967
...Ltd. [1964] A.C. 234, H.L.; [1913] All E.R. 151. 28 Lewis v. Lewis (1958) 1 All E.R. 859. 330 Local Government Board v. Alridge (1915) A.C. 120, 132; 84. L.J.K.B. 72; 30 T.L.R. 672. 60 M. & M. [1928] P. 123; 44 T.L.R. 299. 46 Mabro v. Eagle Star & British Dominions Insurance Co. Ltd. (1932)......
-
'What's Past is Prologue': An Historical Overview of Judicial Review in South Africa — part 2
...Oxford from 1882 until 1909.31 See Dicey 1915, referring to Board of Education v Rice [1911] AC 179 and Local Government Board v Arlidge [1915] AC 120. See, also, Baxter 1984: 46; Chanock 2001: 470ff; Hoexter 2012: 21. To be fair, Dicey’s misgivings about administrative law diminished over ......
-
Natural Justice and Disciplinary Cases in Britain and France
...Jeffs v. New ZealandDairy Production andMarketing Board, [1967] 1 AC 551 Liyanagev. R., [1967] IAC 259 Local Government Board v. Arlidge, [1915] AC 120 Nagle v. Fielden, [1966] 2 QB 633 NakkudaAliv. Jayaratne, [1951] AC66 Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture, [1968] AC 997 Race Relations Boa......