Michael Edward Bogdal (aka Marjan Tadeusz) v R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE PILL,MR JUSTICE UNDERHILL,MRS JUSTICE DOBBS |
| Judgment Date | 16 January 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 1,[2007] EWCA Crim 1549 |
| Date | 16 January 2008 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 200700863 D3,200700863 D3 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
Min for Justice v Makuch
...THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ART 31(1) CRIMINAL JUSTICE (PUBLIC ORDER) ACT 1994 S6 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (PUBLIC ORDER) ACT 1994 S3(D) R v BOGDAL 2008 172 JP 178 2008 EWCA (CRIM) 1 DANGEROUS DOGS ACT 1991 S3(1) R v WATERS 1963 47 CR APP R 149 STANBRIDGE v HEALY 1985 ILRM 290 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1961 S3(......
6 books & journal articles
-
Configuring criminal proceeds in money laundering cases in the UK
...words, no conviction for the predicateoffence is necessary for a person to be prosecuted for a money laundering offence.In Rv. Anwoir [2008] EWCA Crim 1,354, the appellants were charged with moneylaundering contrary to section 328 of POCA relating to £740, 000 in cash paid into abank accoun......
-
‘Dangerous Dogs’
...2015). See also N. Padfield, ‘Sentencing Those Guilty of Dangerous Dog Offences’[2015] 7 Criminal Law Review 471 at 471.41. RvBogdal [2008] EWCA Crim 1. See also Fellowes vCrown Prosecution Service [1993] WL 964524.42. Fellowes vCrown Prosecution Service, ibid.43. These will be explored fur......
-
Proceeds of crime training: bringing it up to date
...criminality. However, they appear to be afuent with lots ofunexplained wealth. The judgement in the case of Rv. Anwoir and others [2008], EWCA crim1,354 provided the prosecution with the tool with which to indict the more difcultindividuals to stand in the dock. The case dealt with the is......
-
Recent changes to the AML/CFT law in Malaysia
...question, it did have toestablish at least the class or type of criminal conduct involved. However, Rv.NWwas notfollowed in R v. Anwoir [2008] EWCA Crim 1,354 in which Latham LJ held that, on the facts ofthe case, the proceeds of the crime could come from drug offences and/or VAT fraud. Imp......
Request a trial to view additional results