Mr Nopporn Suppipat v Mr Nop Narongdej

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Calver
Judgment Date31 July 2023
Neutral Citation[2023] EWHC 1988 (Comm)
CourtKing's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Docket NumberCase No: CL-2018-000716
Between:
(1) Mr Nopporn Suppipat
(2) Symphony Partners Limited
(3) Next Global Investments Limited
(4) Dynamic Link Ventures Limited
Claimants
and
(1) Mr Nop Narongdej
(2) Ms Emma Louise Collins
(3) Mr Thun Reansuwan
(4) Mr Aman Lakhaney
(5) Ms Khadija Billal Siddique
(6) Colome Investments Limited
(7) Keleston Holdings Limited
(8) Alkbs LLC
(9) Golden Music Limited
(10) Siam Commercial Bank Public Company Limited
(11) Khun Arthid Nanthawithaya
(12) Cornwallis Limited
(13) Khun Weerawong Chittmittrapap
(14) Dr Kasem Narongdej
(15) Ms Khunying Korkaew Boonyachinda
(16) Mr Pradej Kitti-Itsaranon
(17) Mr Nuttawut Phowborom
Defendants

[2023] EWHC 1988 (Comm)

Before:

Mr Justice Calver

Case No: CL-2018-000716

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

KING'S BENCH DIVISION

BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES

COMMERCIAL COURT

Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building

Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL

Justin Fenwick KC, George Spalton KC, Lucy Colter, Marie-Claire O'Kane, Ian McDonald, Carola Binney (instructed by Willkie Farr & Gallagher (UK) LLP) for the Claimants

Tim Penny KC, Ciaran Keller, Benedict Tompkins, Gretta Schumacher (instructed by Harcus Parker Limited) for the First and Seventeenth Defendants

Derrick Dale KC, Joseph Farmer (instructed by Signature Litigation) for the Second to Eighth Defendants

The Ninth, Twelfth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Defendants were unrepresented

The Sixteenth Defendant was unrepresented and did not appear

Jonathan Davies-Jones KC, David Simpson, Georges Chalfoun, Clarissa Jones (instructed by RPC) for the Tenth Defendant

Ruth den Besten KC, John Robb (instructed by Clyde & Co) for the Eleventh and Thirteenth Defendants

Hearing dates: Monday 17th October 2022 – Thursday 2nd March 2023

This judgment was handed down by the Judge remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 9:15 on Monday 31 st July 2023.

Contents

FACTUAL NARRATIVE

10

BACKGROUND TO THE CLAIM

10

The parties to the claim

10

Transfer of REC shares

11

WEH and its wind power projects in Thailand

11

WEH IPO preparation: valuations of company in 2014–2015

13

Mr Suppipat's exile and consequent exit from REC

14

Impact on WEH's projects of the lèse-majesté charge

17

(1) Khao Kor

17

(2) FKW and KR2

18

(3) Watabak

18

Attempts to sell Mr Suppipat's shares: valuations of WEH

19

MISREPRESENTATION CLAIMS

21

Initial negotiations

21

Mr Suppipat decides to sell to a nominee

21

Negotiations with Khun Nop begin: the Global Transaction Structure

22

The Skype Call of 17 May 2015

25

Nop is to be Mr Suppipat's nominee; no due diligence carried out

27

Linklaters advice on disclosure of a call option

32

Increase in purchase price to $713m and the conclusion of the deal

34

WEH Managers' continued involvement in the call option

36

REC SPAs

38

The REC Share Purchase Agreements

38

The KPN EH Shareholders Agreement: the WEH Managers' blocking mechanism to protect Mr Suppipat

40

The Advisory Services Agreement

43

Negotiations to enter into a Call Option Agreement

45

The First Paris Meeting

45

First draft Call Option Agreement

48

Second draft Call Option Agreement

51

Consideration by SCB of Khao Kor

51

SCB's failure to enquire into (i) the deferred payment structure under the REC SPAs and (ii) the “Gentlemen's agreement”

52

The Bangkok Meeting – the draft Steps plan and MOU

54

REC SPAs amended and restated

56

REC share transfer instruments

57

Proposed escrow arrangement

57

Watabak financing

58

Third Draft Call Option and Steps Plan

59

The (lack of) response

60

Memorandum of Understanding

62

The Symphony transfer and the Watabak Representations

64

WEH Managers' awareness of the call option documents

67

Watabak Facility

67

Meeting in Bangkok

68

The Cannes Meeting

72

First Instalments and financing issues

74

Nop's attempts to source funds to meet the purchase price

74

MBK

75

Payment Representations

76

Second Paris Meeting and First Payment Representations

76

Second Payment Representations

78

ASSET STRIPPING CLAIMS

80

Preparations for asset stripping scheme

80

Payments made under REC SPAs in late 2015

80

Grant Thornton report

81

2016 Arbitration proceedings; Emergency Measures and the BVI injunction

84

SCB's knowledge of and reaction to the arbitration proceedings

88

Engagement of Khun Weerawong

94

Emergency Arbitrator grants emergency measures

97

The 17 March 2016 meeting and the ring-fencing strategy

100

1.25% stake for WEH Managers

103

Project Houdini presentation

104

SCB IPO Engagement Letter

107

SCB Summary Chart of Dispute

108

29 March 2016 meeting of SCB and WCP

110

White Boards

114

Termination of the KPN EH SHA

119

7 April 2016 Meeting Minute

121

Termination of ASA

123

Drafting of First WCP Opinion

124

The Kasem Transfer

130

(1) REC Notices and Minutes

131

(2) Kasem Agency Agreement

135

(3) Kasem SPA

143

(4) Kasem Transfer Instrument

146

(5) Tassapon Transfer Instrument and Revenue Receipt

147

Application to Emergency Arbitrator

151

(6) Purchase Price

151

(7) The Ploenchit Report

153

(10) Repeated failures to update the WEH share register

160

(11) Watabak waiver request and 17 May Credit Committee Meeting

162

(12) Emergency Arbitrator's refusal

163

(13) Finalisation of First WCP Opinion

164

(14) SCB awareness of the Kasem Transfer

167

ExCom Meeting of 25 May 2016: consideration of Watabak Facility

178

SCB's lack of awareness of Kasem SPA purchase price

182

Inspection of transfer documents

183

Second WCP Opinion

186

Watabak share pledge waiver considered and granted

188

Drawdown on Watabak

190

(15) Circular payments under the Kasem SPA

190

(16) Wichai/ Itti Loan Agreements

191

(17) The Orix Negotiations

193

(18) Further Gunkul negotiations

203

Further transfers of Relevant WEH Shares; arbitrations under REC SPA

204

(1) SPV SPAs

204

(2) Failure to satisfy Escrow Condition

205

(3) Golden Music SPA

208

(4) Pradej SPA

209

(5) First Partial Awards in the Arbitrations and the IPO

211

(6) Preparations for the IPO and WEH Managers' 1.25% stakes

212

(7) Janyaluck SPA

220

(8) Cornwallis SPA

220

(9) Belize injunction against Cornwallis

224

(10) Cornwallis-Opus Share Transfer; Srun-Nop Loan Agreement

225

(11) Letter of indemnity

231

(12) “Loan Agreements” Between Khun Nop and Khun Pradej

232

(13) Second Partial Awards under 2016 Arbitrations

233

LEGAL ANALYSIS – PRELIMINARY REMARKS

234

The contemporaneous documentary evidence

234

The burden of proof concerning allegations of fraud

235

The factual witnesses

236

Expert evidence on Thai Law

237

MISREPRESENTATION CLAIMS

238

The pleaded misrepresentations

238

The Global Transaction Representations

238

(1) Limitation

239

(2) Is the Section 341 offence sufficiently pleaded?

247

(3) The merits of the s. 341 offence

251

(4) The requirements of s. 420 TCCC

254

(5) The merits of the s. 357 offence

256

(6) s. 421 TCCC: Abusing Cs' rights

258

The Watabak Representations

260

(1) Merits

260

The Payment Representations

263

(1) Applicable law

263

(2) Time bar

266

Abuse of process

266

(1) The HP Defendants' submissions

266

(2) The Claimants' submissions

268

(3) Factual analysis

270

(4) The law

278

ASSET STRIPPING CLAIMS

284

s. 420 TCCC: Unlawfully causing injury

284

(1) s. 350 TPC: cheating against creditors

287

(2) s. 421 TCCC

307

(3) Combining together to effect the transfer causing harm to Cs

308

(4) s. 237 TCCC: rescission of transactions which cheat creditors

308

(5) Falsifying of documents contrary to sections 179, 264, 265 and 268 TPC

310

(6) Breach of directors' duties under s. 1168, 1206 and 1207 TCCC

315

(7) Non-performance of the Kasem SPA

319

(8) Further alleged elements of unlawfulness

320

(9) The other elements of the section 420 claim (based on s. 350 TPC)

323

s. 432 TCCC: Joint wrongdoers/ assisters/ instigators

326

(1) Joint wrongful act: s. 432(1)

326

(2) Instigation/ assistance: s. 432(2)

327

(3) Applying the law to the facts

331

Limitation

341

(1) s. 420/ s. 350 claim

342

Submissions

342

(2) s. 432 claim

348

s. 423 Insolvency Act

350

(1) Sufficient connection with England and Wales

351

(2) Impossible to get a fair trial in Thailand?

359

Quantum

361

(1) The primary participants (under s. 420 TCCC (based on s. 350 TPC))

362

(2) Against the secondary participants

378

The ASA and related claims

380

(1) The relevant obligations under the ASA

381

(2) The claim for breach of the ASA and the counterclaim

384

(3) Is the ASA forward or backward looking?

384

(4) Breaches of the ASA

389

(5) Breach of fiduciary duty

393

(6) Tort of bribery

398

(7) Unlawful means conspiracy

404

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

407

Misrepresentation Claims

407

Asset-Stripping claims

408

POSTSCRIPT

410

Mr Justice Calver

FACTUAL NARRATIVE

BACKGROUND TO THE CLAIM

The parties to the claim

1

The First Claimant ( Mr Suppipat) is a successful Thai businessman who founded Renewable Energy Corporation Company Limited ( REC) in 2006 and Wind Energy Holding Company Limited ( WEH) in 2009....

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT