Mr Timothy Charles Harris v The Environment Agency

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Johnson
Judgment Date06 September 2022
Neutral Citation[2022] EWHC 2264 (Admin)
Docket NumberCase No: CO/3345/2021
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Shadowmill Ltd v an Bord Pleanala
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 March 2023
    ...in Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145 and of the Queen's Bench in R(Harris) v Environment Agency [2022] EWHC 2264, [2022] PTSR 474 Córas Iompair Éireann and Another v An Bord Pleanála and Another [2008] IEHC 295. 475 Sherwin v. An Bord Pleanála [2023] IEHC 26......
  • Coyne and Another v an Bord Pleanála and Others; Coyne and Another v an Bord Pleanála and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 July 2023
    ...v Minister for Aboriginal Affairs [1986] 162 CLR 24. 27 Jennings v An Bord Pleanála 2023 IEHC 14 §217; R (Harris) v Environment Agency [2022] PTSR 1751, [2022] PTSR 1751. In Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145, the Federal Court of Australia said that “… the e......
  • C. G. Fry & Son Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 June 2024
    ...law as a result of section 4(2)(b) [of the Withdrawal Act]. Johnson J explained in [ Harris and another v Environment Agency [2022] EWHC 2264 (Admin)], that the requirements of article 6(3) were accepted as binding by the CJEU in Waddenzee: [90]. Article 6(2) and 6(3) of the Habitats Direc......
  • C G Fry & Son Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing and Communities
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 30 June 2023
    ...of the Directives so far as they may be affected by the exercise of those functions.” 33 In Harris v Environment Agency [2022] EWHC 2264 (Admin) Johnson J held that given its context “have regard to” in section 9(3) meant that the competent authority had to discharge those requirements or ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT