Paragon Finance Plc v Pender

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE JACOB
Judgment Date29 July 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] EWCA Civ 1113
Docket NumberB2/2003/2609
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date29 July 2004

[2004] EWCA Civ 1113

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London, WC2

Before:

Lord Justice Jacob

B2/2003/2609

Paragon Finance Plc (Formerly The National Home Loans Corporation Plc)
Respondent/Claimant
and
Pender & Anr
Applicants/Defendants

MR H PAGE QC appeared on behalf of the Applicants

The Respondent did not appear and was not represented

LORD JUSTICE JACOB
1

I will give you permission on all three grounds, confined to those three grounds. I would like some checking to see what the position is as regards the payments. If they are in accordance with what Peter Smith J ordered, then that is one thing; if they are not, you had better come back and do something about it.

Order: Permission granted on all three grounds. The payments to be checked to make sure that they are in accordance with the order of Peter Smith J.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Meretz Investments NV v ACP Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 December 2007
    ...to FP. He accepted that the leaseback option had been vested in NUBBH by way of charge but, applying the decision of this court in Paragon Finance v Pender [2005] 1 WLR 3412, he held that s 114 did not apply to registered charges (J [361]). I refer to this below as the “ Pender point”. 39 T......
  • Independent Trustee Service Ltd v GP Noble Trustees and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 December 2010
    ...agreed) that the provision could be relied upon to set aside a possession order which had already been made as a final order. 95 In Paragon Finance v Pender [2003] EWHC 2834 (Ch) I expressed the view that a possession order could be set aside under CPR 3.1 (7). In so doing I made the follow......
  • Credit and Mercantile Plc v Marks
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 May 2004
    ... ... Except for a case in the Macclesfield County Court decided in 2000, namely Falco Finance Ltd v Gough , which is of no assistance because the point was conceded, the only authority directly ... subject to the right of redemption then subsisting." In a recent case, Paragon Finance Plc v Pender [2003] EWHC 2834 (Ch) , 25 November 2003, it was held by Peter Smith J that ... ...
  • Emerald Supplies Ltd and Others v British Airways Plc Air Canada and Others (Third Parties) Japan Airlines Company Ltd and Others (Fourth Parties)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 October 2014
    ...Rules for some considerable time see Mond v Hammond Suddards [2000] Ch 40. It has even extended in my view to final orders see Paragon Finance v Pender [2003] EWHC 2834 paragraph 97 I go on now to consider the so-called Pergan principle. There is no doubt that in civil proceedings where th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT