Pasmore and Others v Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 28 April 1898 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1898] UKHL J0428-1 |
| Date | 28 April 1898 |
Pasmore and Others
and
Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council.
[1898] UKHL J0428-1
House of Lords
1
After hearing Counsel on Tuesday last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Wilberforce Savery Pasmore, of 3, Eastbourne Terrace, Paddington, in the county of London, Howard Maxwell Peebles, of 32, Cleveland Square, in the County of London, George John Maddick, of South Bank House, Surbiton, in the county of Surrey, and James Mortimer Garrard, of 171, Victoria Street, Westminster, in the county of London (the executors of Philip Cadell Peebles, deceased), and of A. M. Peebles and Son, Limited,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
76 cases
- Parkson Corporation Sdn Bhd v Fazaruddin Ibrahim
-
An Application by Desmond Emanuel Alphonso for redress pursuant to article 31 of the said Constitution, for the likely contravention of article 16(9) thereof, in relation to him Applicant v The Attorney General of the Virgin Islands Respondent
...that right can only seek to do so by the remedy provided: Barraclough v Brown (1897) A.C. 615 at page 619 and Pasmore v Oswaldtwistle UDC (1898) AC 387. 7. Article 18 of the Constitution means exactly what is says: that an alien has the right to have his deportation order reviewed by a comp......
- Damansara Realty Bhd v Bungsar Hill Holdings Sdn Bhd and Another
- Dr. A. Dutt v Assunta Hospital
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2538, 2649 Parry v. Aluminium Corporation (1940) W.N. 44…………………………………......………..2522 Pasmore v. Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council (1898) A.C. 387, 394; (1895 – 1899) All E.R. 191……………………………………………………………………………................………1907 Patrick J. Osaba v. The Queen F.S.C. 141/1961 decided by ......
-
A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa
...with or is in contravention of a 105 Mensah at 498. 106 Two English cases were cited as authority: Pasmore v Oswald Twistle UDC [1898] AC 387; Wilkinson v Barking Corporation [1948] 1 KB 721. © Juta and Company (Pty) A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF REASON AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF ELECTIONS IN AFR......
-
A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa
...with or is in contravention of a 105 Mensah at 498. 106 Two English cases were cited as authority: Pasmore v Oswald Twistle UDC [1898] AC 387; Wilkinson v Barking Corporation [1948] 1 KB 721. © Juta and Company (Pty) A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF REASON AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF ELECTIONS IN AFR......
