Pasmore and Others v Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 28 April 1898 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1898] UKHL J0428-1 |
Court | House of Lords |
Date | 28 April 1898 |
[1898] UKHL J0428-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel on Tuesday last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Wilberforce Savery Pasmore, of 3, Eastbourne Terrace, Paddington, in the county of London, Howard Maxwell Peebles, of 32, Cleveland Square, in the County of London, George John Maddick, of South Bank House, Surbiton, in the county of Surrey, and James Mortimer Garrard, of 171, Victoria Street, Westminster, in the county of London (the executors of Philip Cadell Peebles, deceased), and of A. M. Peebles and Son, Limited, of 153, Queen Victoria Street, in the city of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 18th of March 1897, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners, might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; And due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 18th day of March 1897, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
An Application by Desmond Emanuel Alphonso for redress pursuant to article 31 of the said Constitution, for the likely contravention of article 16(9) thereof, in relation to him Applicant v The Attorney General of the Virgin Islands Respondent
...that right can only seek to do so by the remedy provided: Barraclough v Brown (1897) A.C. 615 at page 619 and Pasmore v Oswaldtwistle UDC (1898) AC 387. 7. Article 18 of the Constitution means exactly what is says: that an alien has the right to have his deportation order reviewed by a comp......
-
Pharmascience Inc. v. Binet, [2006] 2 SCR 513
...[1874‑80] All E.R. Rep. 757; Couch v. Steel (1854), 3 El. & Bl. 402, 118 E.R. 1193; Pasmore v. Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council, [1898] A.C. 387; Deveault v. Centre Vu Lebel & Des Roches Inc., Sup. Ct. Montreal, No. 500‑05‑003478‑854, May 24, 1985; Ordre des optométristes du Qué......
- Dr. A. Dutt v Assunta Hospital
-
Wentworth v Wiltshire County Council
...was intended by Parliament, see Doe v. Bridges [1831] 1 B & Ad 847 per Lord Herschell at page 859, Pasmore v. OswaldtwistleUPC [1898] AC 387 at page 394 and Lonrho Ltd. v. Shell Petroleum Ltd [1982] AC 173, per Lord Diplock at p 185. The indication is of course not conclusive for there are ......
-
Table of Cases
...2538, 2649 Parry v. Aluminium Corporation (1940) W.N. 44…………………………………......………..2522 Pasmore v. Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council (1898) A.C. 387, 394; (1895 – 1899) All E.R. 191……………………………………………………………………………................………1907 Patrick J. Osaba v. The Queen F.S.C. 141/1961 decided by ......
-
A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa
...with or is in contravention of a 105 Mensah at 498. 106 Two English cases were cited as authority: Pasmore v Oswald Twistle UDC [1898] AC 387; Wilkinson v Barking Corporation [1948] 1 KB 721. © Juta and Company (Pty) A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF REASON AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF ELECTIONS IN AFR......
-
A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa
...with or is in contravention of a 105 Mensah at 498. 106 Two English cases were cited as authority: Pasmore v Oswald Twistle UDC [1898] AC 387; Wilkinson v Barking Corporation [1948] 1 KB 721. © Juta and Company (Pty) A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF REASON AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF ELECTIONS IN AFR......