Pasmore and Others v Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date28 April 1898
Judgment citation (vLex)[1898] UKHL J0428-1
CourtHouse of Lords
Date28 April 1898

[1898] UKHL J0428-1

House of Lords

Pasmore and Others
and
Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council.
1

After hearing Counsel on Tuesday last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Wilberforce Savery Pasmore, of 3, Eastbourne Terrace, Paddington, in the county of London, Howard Maxwell Peebles, of 32, Cleveland Square, in the County of London, George John Maddick, of South Bank House, Surbiton, in the county of Surrey, and James Mortimer Garrard, of 171, Victoria Street, Westminster, in the county of London (the executors of Philip Cadell Peebles, deceased), and of A. M. Peebles and Son, Limited, of 153, Queen Victoria Street, in the city of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 18th of March 1897, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners, might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; And due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:

2

It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 18th day of March 1897, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
51 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 17. Part III Preliminary sections
    • July 11, 2016
    ...2538, 2649 Parry v. Aluminium Corporation (1940) W.N. 44…………………………………......………..2522 Pasmore v. Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council (1898) A.C. 387, 394; (1895 – 1899) All E.R. 191……………………………………………………………………………................………1907 Patrick J. Osaba v. The Queen F.S.C. 141/1961 decided by ......
  • A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Comparative Law in Africa No. , June 2021
    • June 30, 2021
    ...with or is in contravention of a 105 Mensah at 498. 106 Two English cases were cited as authority: Pasmore v Oswald Twistle UDC [1898] AC 387; Wilkinson v Barking Corporation [1948] 1 KB 721. © Juta and Company (Pty) A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF REASON AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF ELECTIONS IN AFR......
  • A fundamental law of reason and the constitutional law of elections in Africa
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Comparative Law in Africa No. , June 2021
    • June 30, 2021
    ...with or is in contravention of a 105 Mensah at 498. 106 Two English cases were cited as authority: Pasmore v Oswald Twistle UDC [1898] AC 387; Wilkinson v Barking Corporation [1948] 1 KB 721. © Juta and Company (Pty) A FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF REASON AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF ELECTIONS IN AFR......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT