R v Burns

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeTHE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE
Judgment Date27 April 2010
Neutral Citation[2010] EWCA Crim 1023
Docket NumberNo. 2009/04855/D3
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date27 April 2010

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • R v Edina Day
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 17 April 2015
    ...appellant. 8 Counsel for the Crown, Mr Gordon, who has distinguished himself by tenacious submissions this morning, referred to the case of Burns [2010] 2 Cr.App.R 16. That was a case on different facts. A man who had picked up a prostitute used violence to remove her from his car. At para......
  • Taueki v R
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 17 December 2013
    ...(8th ed, MacMillan, New York, 1914) at 489. 33 R v Jones [2006] UKHL 16, [2007] AC 136 at [77]–[78] (citations omitted); and see also R v Burns [2010] EWCA Crim 1023, [2010] 1 WLR 2694 at 34 AP Simester and WJ Brookbanks Principles of Criminal Law (4th ed, Brookers, Wellington, 2012) at ......
  • 香港特別行政區 訴 胡慕珠
    • Hong Kong
    • 16 January 2023
    ...v Favillaran Ludy Visillas & Anor HCMA 478/2006,第 9-11頁第23-26段)。 (6) 除了以上情況外,普通法亦承認無確立了一項可稱之為「自救」的行為或 抗辯理據 (案例:R v Burns [2010] 2 Cr. App. R. 16, (7) 關於自救的概念,本席認為以下法律原則和觀點是適用的。如一名人士施以武力的目的是為了重奪財產的管有權(recapture of property),而非令財產不會蒙受實際或迫在眉睫的破壞(actual or imminent damage),則不屬保衛財產的情況,而只屬自救情況。自救......
2 books & journal articles
  • Private Defence and Public Defence in the Criminal Law and in the Law of Tort—A Comparison
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-1, February 2012
    • 1 February 2012
    ...breach of the peace. Whilst the breachof the peace is not an offence, the arrest is lawful so public defence applies.20 In R v Burns [2010] EWCA Crim 1023, [2010] 1 WLR 2694, the appellant, havingagreed to take a prostitute in his car to a secluded area on the understanding thathe would ret......
  • Houseguests, trespassers and the use of reasonable force in ejectment
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 79-6, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...eject him using reasonable force if he refuses’ (at [11]; emphasis added).The Crown in the present case relied on the case of RvBurns [2010] EWCA Crim 1023, [2010] 1WLR 2694, in support of the proposition that D could not claim the defence of ejectment. In Burns,theaccused had been convicte......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT