R v Coward
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE LAWTON |
| Judgment Date | 11 March 1976 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1976] EWCA Crim J0311-4 |
| Date | 11 March 1976 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 3872/A/75 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
MacDougall v MacPhail
...and each part must be capable of analysis by means of a test in the laboratory. This, as Lawton L.J. pointed out in R. v. CowardUNK [1976] R.T.R. 425 at p. 428K, was the position where the request was made under sec. 9 of the Road Traffic Act 1972, and the effect of the provisions in the 19......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Cowan v DPP [2013] EWHC 192 (Admin), unreported! 444 .................................. Coward, R v (1976) 63 Cr App R 54, [1976] RTR 425, CA! 144 ................................................. Cowper v DPP [2009] EWHC 2165 (Admin), DC! 373 Cox, R on the Application of, v DPP [2009] EWHC......
-
Specimens for Laboratory Testing
...in the jar was not provided.” Any question of reasonable excuse would have been for the defendant to make out. Appeal allowed. R v Coward [1976] RTR 425, 11 March 1976, CA To be sufficient, a urine specimen must be capable of being divided into two parts such that both parts are capable of......