R v David Curley James Cadwell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE MAY |
| Judgment Date | 27 August 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Crim 2395 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No:2003/0049/C2, 2003/2095/C2, 2003/6887/C2 |
| Date | 27 August 2004 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
[1] Roger Naitram [2] Lassell Punch [3] Leary Matheson Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
...the trial judge to put the appellant's defence fairly and properly to the jury renders his conviction unsafe. R v Curley and Cadwell [2004] EWCA Crim 2395 applied. BAPTISTE, J.A. 1 On 6 th July 2006 Roger Naitram, Lassell Punch and Leary Matheson ("the appellants") were convicted on an ind......
-
Baldath Rampersad v The State
...Summing Up dated March 8, 2017 at page 9, line 24 to page 10, line 17. 35 Summing Up dated March 9, 2017 at page 27, lines 11–32. 36 [2004] EWCA Crim 2395. See also R v Clarke [2010] EWCA Crim 37 Summing Up dated March 9, 2019 at page 16, lines 21–34. 38 Summing Up dated March 9, 2017 at ......
-
R v M.B.
...she was interviewed about these matters." 9 We were referred to a number of cases which the appellant submitted supported her case. In Curley and Cadwell [2004] EWCA Crim. 2395 it was contended that the judge had not properly given any adequate summary of the appellant's case to the jury. ......
-
Naitram, Punch and Matheson v The Queen
...the trial judge to put the appellant's defence fairly and properly to the jury renders his conviction unsafe. R v Curley and Cadwell [2004] EWCA Crim 2395 applied. Baptiste, J.A. 1 On 6 th July 2006 Roger Naitram, Lassell Punch and Leary Matheson (“the appellants”) were convicted on an ind......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Doctors Are Aggrieved—Should They Be? Gross Negligence Manslaughter and the Culpable Doctor
...glaringly obvious the risk would havebeen to a reasonable person.10. See later R v Adomako [1995] 1 AC 171; R v Misra and Srivastava [2004] EWCA Crim 2395; R v Rudling [2016] EWCA Crim741.11. R v Bateman [1925] All ER 45, 48.12. Her uterus was severely damaged and delivered along with the p......