R v Hashib Apabhai and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE ELIAS |
| Judgment Date | 18 March 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] EWCA Crim 917 |
| Docket Number | No: 201000757 D5 / 201000648 D5 / 201000824 D5 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 18 March 2011 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
Paul Edward Phillips v R
...However, the legal meaning of the term "substantial probative value" must be the same in each case. The Court in Apabhai and Others [2011] EWCA Crim 917, a case which concerned the application of section 101(1)(e), agreed with and adopted, at §42, the Scott approach to the meaning of "subst......
-
James Francis Byrne v R
...judge's decision on that aspect is not open to criticism. 135 We turn to consider section 101(1)(e). Mr Rose relied upon R v Apabhai [2011] EWCA Crim 917 where this Court stated that the word “ substantial” means that the evidence concerned “ has more than trivial probative value” ([38]). ......
-
R v Bledar Haxihaj and Others
...An application was made on behalf of Veres to adduce evidence of Yilmazer's threats and threatening conduct. The judge was referred to R v Apabhai [2011] EWCA Crim 917. It was submitted for Veres that the case fell within section 98(b) Criminal Justice Act 2003, ie that the evidence concern......
-
R v Michael Hewgill and Others
...did not require correction. Therefore he ruled against the application. 65 On Hancock's behalf Mr Barker QC submitted, citing Apabhai [2011] EWCA Crim 917 and Randall (above), that the judge had fallen into error in these rulings by failing to recognise that: i) This was bad character evide......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Admissibility of Third Party Previous Convictions under PACE s. 74 R v Denham; R v Stansfield [2016] EWCA Crim 1048
...s. 78 discretion if the evidence is tendered by the prosecu-tion) (see, for example, R v Mullings [2011] 2 Cr App R 2 and R v Apabhai [2011] EWCA Crim 917). Forexample, in R v Smith—one of the s. 74 authorities relied on by the judge in R v Denham; R v Stansfield—the Court of Appeal (at [9]......