R v Lennard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE LAWTON
Judgment Date08 March 1973
Neutral Citation[1973] EWCA Crim J0308-9
Judgment citation (vLex)[1973] EWCA Crim J0308-4
Docket NumberNo. 5538/C/72
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date08 March 1973
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
73 cases
  • R v G; R v J
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 4 March 2009
    ...his newspaper. Mr Perry suggested that the defence should be construed narrowly so as to confine it to cases such as these. He pointed to R v Lennard [1973] 1 WLR 483, 487 where the Court of Appeal had indicated that only a very narrow range of circumstances could amount to a reasonable ex......
  • R v Reid (Philip)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 15 June 1973
    ...that abundantly justifies the approach of the learned Judge to the question in this summing-up. I refer to the as yet unreported case of R. v. Leonard. I make only this observation. We are, of course, bound by that decision, but, even if at any time hereafter it should be considered that th......
  • Grady v Pollard
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Coates (Philip)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 23 March 1976
    ...convicted the Appellant. 7 It is plain that the learned Judge founded his direction upon the decision of this Court in the case of R. v. Lennard (1973) 1 Weekly Law Reports, 483. The case is well known and it is necessary only to refer to one sentence in the judgment of the Court given by L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Any Excuse for Certainty: English Perspectives on the Defence of ‘Reasonable Excuse’
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-5, October 2010
    • 1 October 2010
    ...minimal requirement of mens rea for thes. 58 offence and the relatively low burden that is placed on the 45 Above n. 44.46 R v Lennard [1973] 1 WLR 483.47 R v G [2009] UKHL 13, [2010] 1 AC 43 at [81].48 R v Lennard [1973] 1 WLR 483 at 487, per Lawton L.J, delivering judgment of court: ‘In o......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2015
    ...[1998] All ER (EC) 604, ............................................. [1998] ECR I-3711, [1998] 3 CMLR 261, ECJ! 262 Lennard, R v [1973] 1 WLR 483, [1973] 2 All ER 831, [1973] RTR 252, .................... ! [1973] Crim LR 312, CA (Crim)! 197, 224, 225, 227 , 230, 232, 237, ! ! ! 244, 245, ......
  • Reasonable Excuse
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...(Scott James), page 196 – in the absence of medical reasons, there can be no reasonable excuse for failing to provide. R v Lennard [1973] 1 WLR 483, [1973] 2 All ER 831, [1973] RTR 252, [1973] Crim LR 312, 8 March 1973, CA, Criminal Division An excuse for failing to provide a specimen is re......
  • Excuse for Failure to Supply a Specimen
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 63-6, December 1999
    • 1 December 1999
    ...claim in this case that there had been amisunderstanding.Whether the facts mayamountto a reasonable excuse is a question oflaw(LawvStephens[1973]RTR252). At first,thecourts confined thedefence to cases in which the defendant was shown to be physically ormentally incapable of acceding to the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT