R v LS

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMRS JUSTICE SWIFT,LORD JUSTICE MOSES
Judgment Date15 January 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] EWCA Crim 104,[2008] EWCA Crim 3053
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberNo: 200800654/D3,No. 2008/00654/D3
Date15 January 2009

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Bernard Knowles JR v The Director of Public Prosecutions
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 30 May 2022
    ...No 223 and 267 of 2016 considered R v Barnett (Richard) [2002] EWCA Crim 454 considered R v Gynane [2020] EWCA Crim 1348 considered R v LS [2009] EWCA Crim 104 considered R v Murray [2016] 4 W.L.R 142 considered R v Newry [2002] BHS J. No. 25 mentioned The People v Hegerty [2013] IECCA ......
  • R v L
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • 20 May 2014
    ...is undefined and is not limited to illness or other cause making it literally impossible for the jury to continue to act. In S [2009] EWCA Crim. 104 it was stated that the test for discharge of a juror, where there was potential for prejudice, was whether the presence of the juror might dep......
  • R v Joe Derek Gynane
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 7 October 2020
    ...complacent or naive nor unduly cynical or suspicious. 36 In addition, Mr Henry has taken us to the cases of Khan [2008] 2 AC 13; LS [2009] EWCA Crim 104; KC [2009] EWCA Crim 2458; and Pouladin-Kari [2013] EWCA Crim 158. He attaches particular emphasis to the last of those cases, in which......
  • R v Carter (David)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 4 February 2010
    ...of counsel on both sides have revealed a direction given by a trial judge and the observations by this court about it in a very similar case, R v LS [2009] EWCA Crim 1041. In that case, after a juror had been discharged during the jury's retirement, the judge directed the remaining members ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Case Commentaries
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 13-3, July 2009
    • 1 July 2009
    ...does not have a right to a verdict on which all the deliberating jurors are agreed, but, according to the Court of Appeal in R v LS [2009] EWCA Crim 104, the has a right to a verdict reached in the physical presence of all jurors who have not been discharged (ibid. at [16]). (Realistically,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT