R v Mark Bown
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE KEENE |
| Judgment Date | 23 June 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] EWCA Crim 1989 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 23 June 2003 |
| Docket Number | No: 200202772/W3 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
- R v McAuley
-
R v Wang (Cheong)
...defendant had failed to discharge an evidential burden lying on him: [2003] EWCA Crim 3228, para 8. Reference was made to R v Bown [2003] EWCA Crim 1989, [2004] 1 Cr App R 151, as an example of a recent case in the second class, in which the Court of Appeal had upheld a direction to convic......
-
R v Clancy
...against conviction on the grounds that the defence should have been left to the jury. The court repeated what it had said in R v Bown [2003] EWCA Crim. 1989, [2004] 1 Cr. App. R. 151, namely, that judges should be slow to rule that the evidence is, as a matter of law, incapable of establish......
-
R. v. Wang, (2005) 332 N.R. 49 (HL)
...- Topic 4359.1 ]. Cases Noticed: Director of Public Prosecutions v. Stonehouse, [1978] A.C. 55 (H.L.), folld. [para. 3]. R. v. Bown, [2003] EWCA Crim 1989; [2004] 1 Cr. App. Rep. 151, refd to. [para. 7]. Woolmington v. Director of Public Prosecutions, [1935] A.C. 462, consd. [para. 9]. Josh......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Role of Subjectivity in Determining ‘Good Reason’ to Possess a Bladed Article
...‘Good Reason’ to Possess a Bladed Article181 made out having regard to all the evidence. The case of R vBown [2003]EWCA Crim 1989, [2004] 1 Cr App R 13 considered the differencebetween what amounted to a good reason (a jury question) and whatwas actually capable of amounting to good reason ......