R v Mercer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE KEENE
Judgment Date15 March 2001
Neutral Citation[2001] EWCA Crim 638
Docket NumberNo: 200003856/Z5
Date15 March 2001
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • R v Abdulla Ahmed Ali and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 19 May 2011
    ...well known statements of principle in R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Courtex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42, R v Latif [1996] 1 WLR 104, R v Mercer [2001] EWCA Crim 68 and R v Horsham Justicesex parte Reeves (1982) 75 Cr App R 236. 161 It seems to us that although it is necessary to conside......
  • R v Peter James Wilson George Moon William Michael Dickman John Matthew Austin
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 5 April 2004
    ...his role or his plea. It is clear that that approach was mistaken, particularly in the light of the decision of this court in Mercer [2001] EWCA Crim 638. Quite rightly, Mr Edis QC does not heavily rely on that, particularly in the light of the fact that the applicant Wilson was taking the ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Secondary Liability In The Criminal Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 24 June 2011
    ...on Human Rights when the prosecution alleges that D is party to an offence but cannot specify his precise role: R v. Mercer [2001] EWCA Crim. 638. Because the common law principle is that aiding and abetting etc. is not a distinct offence, the liability of a secondary party is properly desc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT