R v Mohan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE JAMES |
| Judgment Date | 04 February 1975 |
| Neutral Citation | [1975] EWCA Crim J0204-2 |
| Docket Number | No. 3763/A/74 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 04 February 1975 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
R v Kellett
...accused desired that consequence of his act or not" and no matter whether the offence attempted itself requires a specific intent or not: Mohan's case, 1975 2 Weekly Law Reports, 859 at page 867 'D' and the authorities there cited. Did the Lord Chief Justice then rightly describe to the ju......
-
Owneast Shipping Ltd v Qatar Navigation QSC
...as I know its meaning has not. There is no separate legal meaning to the word. This retains its dictionary sense…” (Emphasis added.). 25 In R v Mohan [1976] 1 QB 1,10H-11A, the Court of Appeal emphasized that recklessness i.e. acting with knowledge of the likely consequences was not to be “......
-
R v Pearman
...than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence, he is guilty of attempting to commit the offence," 14 This court, in the case of Mohan 60 Cr. App.R. 272, dealt with the question of the mental element in an attempt before passing to that Act. It is not necessary to deal with the fa......
-
R v Pace and another
...from, and at a higher level than, that applicable to the substantive offence itself. 47 The same point can be made with regard to the case of Mohan (1974) 60 CAR 272, which also antedated the 1981 Act. In that case the accused was charged with, and convicted of, an offence of attempting, ha......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
The Pitfalls in the Law of Attempt: A New Perspective
...removed from the commission of the intended offence, the courtsmust not ‘strain to bring within the offence of attempt conduct which 1 [1976] QB 1.2 Ibid. at 2.3 Ibid. at 8.4 Ibid.5 Ibid.6 Ibid.7 Ibid. at 10.8 Ibid.9 Ibid. at The Journal of Criminal Law does not fall within the well-establi......
-
On francis bacon and 'doing' jurisprudence
...wh t I w nt to chieve. It c nnot be s id th t I h ve “m de decision” — the pre*imin ry of ction — to bring her h tred bout (see Mohan [1976] QB 1,8). Her h tred h s no necess ry p* ce in my p* n of ction though it m y we** permit it, yet s non-necess ry fe ture even if I conceive her h tred......
-
Doctrinal Rationality after Woolin
...Legal Politics’ [1989] Crim LR 793 at 800–7; R.A. Duff ‘ThePolitics of Intention: a Response to Norrie’ [1990] Crim LR 637.28 See Mohan [1976] QB 1.29 [1957] Crim LR 365.30 Gillick vWest Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1986] AC 112.31 This mental attitude is described in other jurisdictions as wic......
-
Woollin: more on foresight and all that
...& Hayles (1990) 90 Cr. App. R.226, at p. 230 per Lloyd L.J.; and see Gullefer [1990] 3 All E.R. 882, at p. 884 per Lord Lane C. J. 38 [1975] 2 All E.R. 193. 39 [1950] 1 AllE.R.720, at p. 724: cited with approval, e.g., by Lord Hailsham in Hyam [1974] 2 All E.R. 41, at pp. 51-2. 40 At p. 200......
Request a trial to view additional results