R v Paul Alexander Cleeland

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Potter
Judgment Date13 February 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] EWCA Crim 293
Docket NumberCase No: 2000/6698/Z1
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date13 February 2002

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • R Paul Cleeland v Criminal Cases Review Commission
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 de maio de 2019
    ...when he represented himself on the hearing of the appeal in 2002, see [4] of the judgment in the Court of Appeal, R v. Cleeland [2002] EWCA Crim 293, and in the two previous Divisional Court 11 During the hearing of the present challenge, the Claimant again sought to enlarge the argument b......
  • Paul Alexander Cleeland v Criminal Cases Review Commission
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 30 de junho de 2021
    ...made by his counsel. He advanced 20 grounds of appeal. On 13 February 2002 the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal: R v Cleeland [2002] EWCA Crim 293 (“the 2002 judgment”). It is relevant to quote what the Court of Appeal said about the Essex guns in paragraphs 94 to 96 of the 2002 judgme......
  • R Paul Cleeland v Criminal Cases Review Commission
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 de janeiro de 2022
    ...made by his counsel. He advanced 20 grounds of appeal. On 13 February 2002 the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal: R v Cleeland [2002] EWCA Crim 293. 28 At the trial the prosecution case had been that the murder weapon was a Gye and Moncrieff shotgun. One of the grounds of appeal in the ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Fresh Evidence and Factual Innocence in the Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 81-4, August 2017
    • 1 de agosto de 2017
    ...[2002] EWCA Crim 1141.86. [2002] EWCA Crim 957.87. [2002] EWCA Crim 925.88. [2002] EWCA Crim 543.89. [2002] EWCA Crim 162.90. [2002] EWCA Crim 293.91. See above n. 89 at para. 11.92. [2002] All ER (D) 80.93. Ibid. at para. 37.94. [2005] UKPC 4.Roberts While ...the Court of Appeal and this H......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT