Reddaway and Others v Banham and Others
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 26 March 1896 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1896] UKHL J0326-3 |
| Date | 26 March 1896 |
Reddaway and Others
and
Banham and Others.
[1896] UKHL J0326-3
House of Lords
1
After hearing Counsel, as well on Tuesday the 18th as Thursday the 20th, Friday the 21st, and Monday the 24th days of February last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Frank Reddaway, and F. Reddaway and Co., Limited, of Pendleton, in the County of Lancaster, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 18th of December 1894, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered; or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
99 cases
- Cellular Clothing Company, Ltd, v Maxton and Murray
-
Shorts International Ltd v Google LLC
...and adding a point made by Jacob LJ in Phones 4u Ltd v Phone4U.co.uk Internet Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 244 at [23], one arising from Reddaway v Banham [1896] AC 199, and one made by Mr Alexander in PlanetArt at [69]: i) Passing off requires deception – it is not enough if members of the public a......
- Yomeishu Seizo Company Ltd & 2 Ors v Sinma Medical Products (M) Sdn Bhd
- Parsons v Gillespie
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Fundamentals Of A Civil Asset Recovery Action - Part 1
...and then it is modest and retiring; it would be honesty itself if it could only afford it." Per Lord MacNaughten in Reddaway v. Banham [1896] A.C. 199 at Selecting the Place of Judgment. In constructing a model to recover concealed assets that have been fragmented, camouflaged and moved to ......
5 books & journal articles
-
The Intersection between Registered and Unregistered Trade Marks
...71 See Wadlow, above n 43, 753–6 and the cases cited therein. 72 Ibid 756. Cf Scotch Whisky [2007] FCA 1649, [60]–[62] (Sundberg J). 73 [1896] AC 199. 74 See Wadlow, above n 43, 756. 75 But note, in the context of European law, the discussion that has occurred over the prohibition of marks ......
-
PARALLEL IMPORTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SINGAPORE
...Custom Built Ltd[1989] R.P.C. 455 at p.466 per Ralph Gibson L.J. 79 See Reddaway (Frank) & Co. Ltd. v. George Banham & Co. Ltd.[1896] A.C. 199; Perry v. Truefitt(1842) 49 E.R. 749 and see also Spalding (A.G.) & Bros. v. A.W. Gamage Ltd.(1915) 32 R.P.C. 273. 80 See in particular Henderson v.......
-
Creation of a Trade Mark in South African Law: a View with some Unconventional Elements
...siness or product , identifying su ch rather than any ot her” (737F-H) See the locus cla ssicus on seconda ry meaning, Red daway v Banham [1896] AC 199 See also New Media Publishing (Pty) Ltd v Eating Out Web Ser vices CC 2005 5 SA 388 (C) (the E ating Out case) 404F-G; Bress Design s (Pty)......
-
THE MEANING OF ‘INVENTED’ IN TRADE MARK LAW
...Marks Act f938. 8 Supra, note 1. 9 [1991] 3 MLJ 251. 10 These are pictographs used in writing by both the Chinese and the Japanese. 11 [1896] AC 199. 12 Supra, note 1, at 359. 13 For another definition of “newness”, see s 14 of the Singapore Patents Act 1995 (Cap 221, 1995 Ed): an invention......
Get Started for Free