Robert Baker v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Fulford |
| Judgment Date | 19 February 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] EWCA Crim 176 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201900428 A3 & 201901790 A1 |
| Date | 19 February 2020 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
R v William Johnstone
...flask. We consider that his dangerousness was obvious, assessing the risk on the basis of the defendant being at large (see R v Baker [2020] EWCA Crim 176; [2020] 2 Cr App R(S) 41 The judge should have imposed an extended sentence, pursuant to sections 279 to 281 of the 2020 Act, albeit we......
-
R v Martin Marland
...was already subject to an indeterminate sentence for public protection and was post-tariff. Having considered R v Baker and Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 176, the judge decided that it was appropriate to impose an extended 18 Having applied the stated discount for the guilty pleas, the judge a......
1 books & journal articles
-
Is There a ‘Practical Benefit’ to an Extended Sentence?: R v Baker & Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 176
...Extended Sentence? sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0022018320923784 journals.sagepub.com/home/clj R v Baker & Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 176 KeywordsExtended sentence, indeterminate sentence, compatibility between sentences, distinguishingjudgment of Supreme Court in R v In Sep......