T. B. Seath and Company v Moore
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 08 March 1886 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1886] UKHL J0308-2 |
| Date | 08 March 1886 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Docket Number | No. 6. |
[1886] UKHL J0308-2
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Monday the 1st as Tuesday the 2d and Thursday the 4th days of February last, upon the Petition and Appeal of T. B. Seath and Company, Shipbuilders, Glasgow and Rutherglen, praying, That the matter of the Interlocutors set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 8th of April 1884, and also an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session there, of the Second Division, of the 9th of December 1884, so far as therein stated to be appealed against, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament; and that the said Interlocutors, so far as aforesaid, might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of Alexander Moore, Chartered Accountant, Glasgow, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estates of A. Campbell and Son, Engineers, Cheapside Street, Anderston, Glasgow, and Alexander Campbell, junior, Engineer there, the sole Partner of said Firm, as such Partner and as an Individual, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Interlocutors in part complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same are hereby Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellants do pay or cause to be paid to the said Respondent the Costs incurred in respect of the said Appeal, the amount thereof to be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments: And it is also further Ordered, That...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- NGV Tech Sdn Bhd and Another v Kerajaan Malaysia
-
People's Park Chinatown Development Pte Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Schindler Lifts (S) Pte Ltd
...185; [1988] SLR 24 (refd) Hobson v Gorringe [1897] 1 Ch 182 (refd) Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328 (folld) Seath & Co v Moore (1886) 11 App Cas 350 (folld) Jude Benny and Abbas Ali (Joseph Tan Jude Benny & Co) for the appellant Jimmy Yim and Philip Lam (Drew & Napier) for the responden......
-
Penney v Clyde Shipbuilding and Engineering Company
...v. WebsterELR, [1904] 1 K. B. 493, Collins, M.R., at p. 499. 2 Seath & Co. v. MooreELR, (1886) 13 R. (H. L.) 57, Lord Watson, at p. 65, 11 App. Cas. 350, at p. 380; Nelson v. William Chalmers & Co., 1913 S. C. 441, Lord Kinnear, at p. 448, and Lord Mackenzie, at p. 3 Seath & Co. v. MooreELR......
-
PBS Energo A.S. v Bester Generacion UK Ltd
...title will only occur upon the incorporation or affixation of the equipment to the site and its fixtures (see e.g. Seath & Co v Moore (1887) 11 App Cas 350, 342 The leading authority on vesting clauses is Clark (Administrator of Cosslett (Contractors) Ltd) v Mid Glamorgan CC [1998] Ch 495.......