Tony Lee Vincent Grant, Mohammed Nisar Khan and Salman Ismail v R

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Fulford VP
Judgment Date12 August 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] EWCA Crim 1243
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberCase No: 2019/01928/01853/01951/01993B4

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 firm's commentaries
4 books & journal articles
  • Overwhelming Supervening Acts, Fundamental Differences, and Back Again?
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...and Morris [1966] 2 QB 110 (CA) 120.20. Jogee [2016] UKSC 8, [2017] AC 387 at [32].21. SeeNathan Rasiah’s commentary on Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243 in Criminal Law Week (CLW/21/32/2) who argues that inthe context of unlawful dangerous act manslaughter, OSA ‘is a principle of causation, akin......
  • Overwhelming Supervening Acts, Fundamental Differences, and Back Again?
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...and Morris [1966] 2 QB 110 (CA) 120.20. Jogee [2016] UKSC 8, [2017] AC 387 at [32].21. SeeNathan Rasiah’s commentary on Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243 in Criminal Law Week (CLW/21/32/2) who argues that inthe context of unlawful dangerous act manslaughter, OSA ‘is a principle of causation, akin......
  • Reform of Anglo-American Complicity Law: Conduct, Connectivity and Comparative Solutions
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...to the latter.402394. See Horder (n. 4) at 476–478. See further Lanning and Camille [2021]EWCA Crim 450. Note most recently in Grant[2021]EWCA Crim 1243 the appellate courtemphasise that ultimately the question will be whether the accessory’s conduct may havebeen so distanced in time, place......
  • Reform of Anglo-American Complicity Law: Conduct, Connectivity and Comparative Solutions
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...to the latter.402394. See Horder (n. 4) at 476–478. See further Lanning and Camille [2021]EWCA Crim 450. Note most recently in Grant[2021]EWCA Crim 1243 the appellate courtemphasise that ultimately the question will be whether the accessory’s conduct may havebeen so distanced in time, place......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT