Wozniak v Wozniak

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE DENNING,LORD JUSTICE HODSON
Judgment Date15 April 1953
Judgment citation (vLex)[1953] EWCA Civ J0415-5
Date15 April 1953
CourtCourt of Appeal

[1953] EWCA Civ J0415-5

In The Supreme Court of Judicature

Court of Appeal

(Divorce)

Before:

Lord Justice Denning

Lord Justice Hodson and

Lord Justice Lloyd-Jacob

Wozniak, M. T.
and
Wozniak, I. J.

MR GEORGE L. S. DOBRY (instructed by Messrs George & George) appeared as Counsel on behalf of the Respondent Husband (Appellant).

MR STEPHEN STEWARD (instructed by Messrs W B. Blackwell & Company) appeared as Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner Wife (Respondent).

LORD JUSTICE DENNING
1

In this case both husband and wife are assisted persons under the Legal Aid Scheme. On the 25th September, 1951, the wife launched a Petition for divorce against her husband. The husband's advisers applied for Further Particulars of the Petition; and an Order was made for Further Particulars to be delivered by her. The Particulars that were delivered were not considered satisfactory, and an application was made thereupon by the husband's advisers asking that thePetitioner herself should be attached — that is sent to prison — for failing to deliver proper Particulars. That application came before Mr Justice Karminski, and he held — and it is not now challenged — that the application was completely misconceived and ought never to have been made. There upon he ordered the husband to pay the costs of the application, and he assessed them at £10 to be paid forthwith. The question is whether the Judge had power to make that order having regard to the fact that the husband was a legally assisted person.

2

The matter depends entirely on the interpretation of the Legal Aid and Advice Act, 1949, and the Regulations made there under. Section 2(2) (e) contemplates that an order for costs can be made against an assisted person, but it draws a distinction between an order for costs on the one hand and the amount that has to be paid on the other. The amount has to be determined in accordance with the Regulations: and Regulation 17(1) says specifically: "Where an order for costs is made against an assisted person the determination of the amount of liability for costs in accordance with section 2(2)(e) of the Act … … shall be made at the trial or hearing of the action cause or matter and be final". I see no point whatever in the words "at the trial or hearing" unless they mean the final determination of the matter. They do not include preliminary applications. They do not include the application for attachment in this case. The Judge had therefore no power to assess the sum at £10 as he did.

3

Mr Justice Karminski was impressed by the definition section of the Act, section 17, which defines a matrimonial cause as meaning "proceedings in the House of Lords or Supreme Court in or in connection with a matrimonial cause or matter within the meaning of the 1925 Judicature Act". He thought that the words "in connection with a matrimonial cause or matter" gave him the jurisdictionwhich was asked of him. In my judgment, that is erroneous,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • City Investments Sdn Bhd; Koperasi Serbaguna Cuepacs Tanggungan Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Davis v Johnson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 November 1977
    ...even though he is the owner or the tenant of it in his sole name or it is in joint names: see the cases of Silverstone v. Silverstone (1953) Probate 179, ( Jones v. Jones 1971 1 Weekly Law Reports 396 and Bassett v. Bassett (1975) Family Division 66. Nor is this power confined to cases whe......
  • Wan Sagar bin Wan Embong v Harun bin Taib
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Gayway Linings Ltd v The Law Society
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 June 1980
    ...them I mention some of them if only to dispose of some of the arguments. 20 In chronological order, the first was Wozniak v. Wozniak (1953 Probate, 179). The relevant provision in that case was wholly different from the current statutory provisions. Further, what Lord Justice Denning (as he......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Notices Bibliographiques
    • United Kingdom
    • International Review of Administrative Sciences No. 23-3, September 1957
    • 1 September 1957
    ...Administration 3,, No. 10, International Civil Servant, in «Revue intemationale 1932, pp. 377-387. des Sciences administratives t. 1953, pp. 179-187. CARMOY, Guy de - Thoughts on some ARONSTEIN, Georges - Le statut des fonctionnaires in- Problems of International Organization, in «Revue ter......
  • Anthropological Perspectives on National Character
    • United States
    • ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The No. 370-1, March 1967
    • 1 March 1967
    ...K. Hsu, Americans and Chinese,pp. xii, xvi.8 D. G. Mandelbaum, "On the Study ofNational Character," The American Anthro-pologist, Vol. 55 (1953), p. 179. See alsoMandelbaum’s and Mead’s dialogue in S. Taxet al., An Appraisal of Anthropology Today(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953),......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT