Occupational Stress in UK Law
Barber v Somerset County Council
Here again, it is important to distinguish between signs of stress and signs of impending harm to health. Stress is merely the mechanism which may but usually does not lead to damage to health. If the employee or his doctor makes it plain that unless something is done to help there is a clear risk of a breakdown in mental or physical health, then the employer will have to think what can be done about it.
Harm to health may sometimes be foreseeable without such an express warning.
Unless he knows of some particular problem or vulnerability, an employer is usually entitled to assume that his employee is up to the normal pressures of the job. It is only if there is something specific about the job or the employee or the combination of the two that he has to think harder. Generally he is entitled to take what he is told by or on behalf of the employee at face value.
But how strong should those indications be before the employer has a duty to act? Mr Hogarth argued that only 'clear and unequivocal' signs of an impending breakdown should suffice. But in view of the many difficulties of knowing when and why a particular person will go over the edge from pressure to stress and from stress to injury to health, the indications must be plain enough for any reasonable employer to realise that he should do something about it.
Having shown a breach of duty, it is still necessary to show that the particular breach of duty found caused the harm. It is not enough to show that occupational stress caused the harm. However, the employee does not have to show that the breach of duty was the whole cause of his ill-health: it is enough to show that it made a material contribution: see Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw  AC 613.
Hatton v Sutherland; Barber v Somerset County Council
This is, I think, useful practical guidance, but it must be read as that, and not as having anything like statutory force. Every case will depend on its own facts and the well-known statement of Swanwick J in , 1783, remains the best statement of general principle:
Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust
It is foreseeable injury flowing from the employer's breach of duty that gives rise to the liability. It does not follow that because a claimant suffers stress at work and that the employer is in some way in breach of duty in allowing that to occur that the claimant is able to establish a claim in negligence. As Simon Brown LJ put it in , paragraph 63:
Employment Act 2002
......Unresolved conflict in the workplace can damage morale, increase stress, and may lead to employees quitting their jobs. Equally, disputes taken to ...Similarly, 55-82,000 FTC employees will benefit from greater occupational provision with total benefits of 33-98 million per year. . 215. Costs to ......
The Train Driving Licences and Certificates (Amendment) Regulations 2015
......, alcohol, drugs and other psychoactive substances, illness, stress, fatigue, etc.);. (d) be able to identify the reference and operating ...(g) understand occupational health and safety (e.g. code of behaviour on and near tracks, code of ......
The Solvency 2 Regulations 2015
...... "EIOPA" means the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority established under the EIOPA Regulation; . "EIOPA ... does not increase by more than 5% under a mortality risk stress that is calibrated in accordance with rules implementing paragraphs (2) to ......
The Financial Services (Miscellaneous) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
...... “(e) “(e) an occupational pension scheme within the meaning given in section 1(1) of the Pension ... (aa) the words from “and discloses information” to “stress tests” were omitted; . (bb) for “Union”, in both places it occurs, ......
What can occupational stress diaries achieve that questionnaires can't?
Purpose – The paper aims to demonstrate the efficacy of the qualitative occupational stress diary as a means by which to attain additional depth of insight into the way people experience stress, to...
Determinants and prevalence of occupational stress among Zimbabwean school administrators
A survey of the literature will undoubtedly show that the last two decades have witnessed a proliferation of research studies on occupational stress among educational personnel, and that interest i...
Organizational communication and occupational stress in Australian Catholic primary schools
Purpose: – This paper reports two related studies of relationships between organizational communication and occupational stress of staff members in Catholic primary schools. Design/methodology/app...
Occupational Stress: Perceptions of Teachers in Catholic
A large sample (n = 437) of teachers in Catholic schools in New South Wales, Australia, completed a questionnaire on perceptions of job‐related stress. Six stress factors were isolated (namely poor...
- Occupational Stress In The Construction Sector
- Occupational Stress: Vicarious Liability Claim For Harassment Fails
Stress Claims - Employers' Liability for Psychiatric Illness
......However, in recent years growing numbers of employees have brought claims in respect of psychiatric injury arising from occupational stress. A recent decision of the Court of Appeal, Chairman of the Governors of St. Thomas Becket RC High School -v- Hatton and Others, has set down ......
Liability - 2018 In Review
...... commentary on the interplay between vicarious liability and occupational stress, along with issues of professional reputation. The issue of ......