Caledonian Railway Company v Turcan and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 February 1898 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1898] UKHL J0222-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 22 February 1898 |
[1898] UKHL J0222-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Friday last, as yesterday and this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of the Caledonian Railway Company, incorporated by Act of Parliament, praying That the matter of the Interlocutors set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland of the 1st of December 1896, and also two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session there, of the Second Division, of the 11th of March and the 19th of May 1897, might he reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Interlocutors might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of Charles Jameson Turcan, sole partner of the firm of Charles J. Turcan and Company, as such partner and as an individual, and also as trustee for his said firm of Charles J. Turcan and Company, and the said Charles J. Turcan and Company, for their interests, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration being had of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Interlocutors complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same are hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellants do pay or cause to be paid to the said Respondents the Costs incurred in respect of the said Appeal, the amount thereof to be certified by...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Susan Campbell Or Wilson V. John Wilson
...is consonant with the approach of the learned nineteenth-century judges of the Court of Session in the three cases of Baird v Glendinning (1874) 2 R 25, Sinclair v Baikie (1884) 11 R 413 and Maxton v Bone (1886) 13 R 912 where they considered the statutory predecessors of section 28(1)(a) o......
-
David John Whitehouse Against Philip Gormley Qpm And Others
...and Morrison (1865) 3 McPherson 1026). The official would be liable in damages even if the wrong done was unwitting. Beaton v Ivory (1887) 14 R 1057 could be distinguished, since there the defender’s actings had been lawful and regular. This distinction was stressed in Robertson v Keith. In......
-
R v Mirza; R v Connor and Rollock
...and are liable to be influenced, less or more, by what they thus hear passing in the world." 97 In Pirie v Caledonian Railway Company (1890) 17 R 1157, 1161 Lord President Inglis said that it was out of the question for the court to entertain any challenge after the trial to a verdict which......
-
Gillies Ramsay Diamond+gavin Ramsay+philip Diamond The Partners Of Said Firm As Partners And As Individuals V. Pjw Enterprises Limited For Judicial Review Of A Decision Of An Adjudicator Dated 4 May 2001
...conferred on him by contract or by statute (Aberdeen Rly Co. v Blaikie Bros. (1853) 15 D (HL) 20; Mackay v Barry Parochial Board (1883) 10R. 1046; McAlpine v Lanarkshire and Ayrshire Rly Co. (1889) 17 R. 113; Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia, Reissue vol. 1, Arbitration, para. 50). In this case......
-
Tramways Orders Confirmation (No.4) Act 1901
...Tramway Weston - super - Mare Trsniways and West Riding Tramways. [Sth August 1901.1 IIEREAS under the authority o tlic l'rai11-~7ags Act 1870 33 R: 34 Vim c. 73. the Board of Tradc have made the several Provisional Ordcrs set out in the schedule to this Act annexed : And mlicreas a Provisi......
-
Arizona Administrative Register, Volume 29, Issue 12, March 24, 2023, p. 753-798
...36-2213) R9-25-710. Term and Transferability of License (Authorized by A.R.S. §§ 36-2202(A)(4), 36-2209(A)(2), 36-2213, 36-2214, and 41- 1092.11) R9-25-711. Inspections and Investigations (Authorized by A.R.S. §§ 36-2202(A)(4), 36-2209(A)(2), 36-2213, and R9-25-712. Enforcement Actions (Aut......
-
Arizona Administrative Register, Volume 27, Issue 35, August 27, 2021, p. 1291-1350
...R9-25-706.R9-25-705.Term and Transferability of License (Authorized by A.R.S. §§ 36-2202(A)(4), 36-2209(A)(2), 36-2213, 36-2214, and 41-1092.11) R9-25-707.R9-25-706.Changes Affecting a License (Authorized by A.R.S. §§ 36-2202(A)(4), 36-2209(A)(2), and R9-25-708.R9-25-707.Inspections and Inv......
-
Arizona Administrative Register, Volume 27, Issue 50, December 10, 2021, p. 2841-2885
...III. 21 CFR, Chapter II, Part 1308.13; 4. Schedule IV. 21 CFR, Chapter II, Part 1308.14; and 5. Schedule V. 21 CFR, Chapter II, Part 1308.15. R4-23-1005. Substances Excepted Products Excluded or Exempted from the Schedules of Controlled Substances A. All over-the-counter non-narcotic substa......