Coman Surveyor of Taxes) v Governors of Rotunda Hospital, Dublin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 13 May 1920 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1920] UKHL J0513-2 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 13 May 1920 |
[1920] UKHL J0513-2
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Monday the 19th, as Tuesday the 20th, Thursday the 22d and Friday the 23d, days of April last, upon the Petition and Appeal of W. Coman, of the Custom House, Dublin, Surveyor of Taxes, praying, That the matter of the Order, set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal in Ireland, of the 28th of February 1919, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises, as to His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Governors of the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal in Ireland, of the 28th day of February 1919, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Reversed: And it is further Ordered, That the Decision of the Commissioners for the special purposes of the Income Tax Acts, of the 13th day of August 1917, be, and the same is hereby, Restored: And it is further Ordered (by consent), That the Appellant do pay, or cause to be paid, to the said Respondents, the Costs incurred by them in respect of the said Appeal to this House, as...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fry v Salisbury House Estate Ltd ; Jones v City of London Real Property Company Ltd
...Schedule D as well as, or in substitution for, an assessment under Schedule B". 13 In this connection it would be desirable to deal with the Rotunda case, 1921, 1 Ap. Cas. 1. This case had the peculiarity of being claimed by learned counsel on both sides as authority. The facts were these. ......
-
Twomey (Inspector of Taxes) v Hennessy
...(INSPECTOR OF TAXES) v MCMULLAN BROS LTD 1995 2 IR 217 1995 2 ILRM 498 1995/10/2953 COMAN v GOVERNORS OF ROTUNDA HOSPITAL DUBLIN 1921 1 AC 1 7 TC 517 DAVIS (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) v THE SUPERIORESS, MATER MISERICORDIAE HOSPITAL DUBLIN 1933 IR 480 FRY (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) v SALISBURY HOUSE E......
-
Neumann v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...one does not render the rents any the less the things to be charged. 42 In Cowan v. Governors of the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, 1921, 1 A.C., 1, at p. 12, Lord Birkenhead, L.C., said that Schedule A "clearly shows that the object is to tax what for the sake of brevity may with substantial a......
-
Sywell Aerodrome Ltd v Croft
...down in those decisions. The principal case to which reference must first be made is Governors of the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin v.Coman, [1921] 1 A.C. 1; 7 T.C. 517. In that case the hospital was endeavouring to obtain for the profits of the Rotunda Rooms the exemption given in favour of hos......
-
Wandsworth, Wimbledon and Epsom District Gas Act 1921
...worlis Irom time to time during construction. 11 [Ch. xllii.1 JV&CIsuiovth, TVimbledotL [11& 12 GEO. 6.1 uizcl EJJSOI~L Distvict Gas Ac(, 1921. -1.1). l!K21. (3) The said plans shall as regards the construction _. of' my dwelling-honses and of my street or road coniply in all reiipects with......