Itzaz Nafeez Akhtar v The Queen

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeSir Brian Leveson P
Judgment Date26 February 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] EWCA Crim 176
Docket NumberCase No: 201303165C2; 2013004952
Date26 February 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • James Robert Henderson v Crown Prosecution Service
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 9 March 2016
    ...of Dyer figure in the Case Stated and we consider these below. 13 The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) considered the issue in R v. Akhtar [2015] 1 WLR 3046. The issue in Akhtar arose from the procedural consequences of taking a verdict on count 2 (possession of an offensive weapon) and ......
  • Henry Dunn v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 March 2021
    ...for murder. 42 The concept of true alternatives of that type was distinguished by this Court from “forensic alternatives” in R v Akhtar [2015] EWCA Crim 176; [2015] 1 WLR 3046. In that case the defendant was charged with having an article, namely a petrol bomb, with intent to destroy or dam......
  • R v Nelson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... [ 2016 ] 1 WLR 1990 ; [ 2016 ] 2 Cr App R 7 , DC R v Akhtar (Itzaz) [2015] EWCA Crim 176 ; [ 2015 ] 1 WLR 3046 ; [ 2015 ] 2 ... ...