London and N. E. Railway Company v Brentnall
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 02 February 1933 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1933] UKHL J0202-2 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 02 February 1933 |
[1933] UKHL J0202-2
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of The London and North Eastern Railway Company, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 17th of June, 1932, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of James Herbert Brentnall, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the Respondent, but not being called upon; and due consideration being had of what was offered for the said Appellants:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 17th day of June, 1932, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellants do pay, or cause to be paid, to the said Respondent the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Weaver v Tredegar Iron and Coal Company Ltd
...waiting for it. 6The same principle was applied in this House in the case of ( London and North Eastern Railway Company v. Brentnall 1933, A.C. 489); only in that case the decision was in favour of the employee. I only mention it because it shows, as clearly as Newton's case that the princ......
-
Black v Aitkenhead & Son
...(1936) 29 B. W. C. C. 242; Thomas v. Ocean Coal Co.ELR, [1933] A. C. 100. 7 London and North Eastern Railway Co. v. BrentnallELR,[1933] A. C. 489, Lord Buckmaster at p. 491; Alderman v. Great Western Railway Co.ELR, [1937] A. C. 1 St Helens Colliery Co. v. HewitsonELR, [1924] A. C. 59. 2 Ne......
-
Graham v Bairds & Dalmellington
...1938 S. C. 291; Newton v. Guest, Keen & NettlefoldsUNK, (1926) 19 B. W. C. C. 119;London and North Eastern Railway Co. v. BrentnallELR,[1933] A. C. 489, Lord Buckmaster at p. 2 St Helens Colliery Co. v. HewitsonELR, [1924] A. C. 59, Lord Shaw of Dunfermline at p. 86; Newton v. Guest, Keen &......
-
Railway Assessment Authority v Great Western Ry. Company
...owned by railway companies were not in existence in 1930. There was certainly one in existence in April, 1931: cf. London and North Eastern Railway Company v. Brentnall, (1933) A.C. 489. These observations of the learned Judge are not inconsistent with the proviso including other premises ......