Lonrho Plc and Others v Fayed and Others (No 5)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 July 1993 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1993] EWCA Civ J0722-8 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Date | 22 July 1993 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
189 cases
-
Joseph Pacini v Dow Jones & Company Incorporated
...The judge was unable to find that the “nub” or reality of the claims was based on damage to reputation only. Moreover, the case of Lonrho plc v Fayed (No 5) [1993] 1 WLR 1489 (where it was held that any action claiming damages for injury to reputation had to be brought in defamation) did n......
- Kapt (B) Haji Mohamad bin Ismail v Perwira Affin Bank Berhad (No 2)
-
Alaedeen Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd
...seem to me that there remains a good deal to be said today for the principle, identified long ago by the Court of Appeal in Lonrho v Fayed (No 5) [1993] 1 WLR 1489, that reputational damages are only available in defamation and limited other torts which are premised on the falsity of the in......
-
Mr Rustem Magdeev v Mr Dimitry Tsvetkov
...afford no defence”. He went on at page 1252 to say this: “ I do not think, therefore, that the decision of the Court of Appeal, in Lonrho Plc. v. Fayed is a decision that in circumstances such as these the court has no alternative but to strike out the statement of claim … I am, therefore, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...of applying for interrogatories) were recoverable (British Motor Trade Association v Salvadori[1949] Ch 556; Lonrho plc v Fayed (No 5)[1993] 1 WLR 1489; and R+V Versicherung AG v Risk Insurance and Reinsurance Solutions SA[2006] EWHC 42 (Comm)). The plaintiff had to serve interrogatories on......
-
Tort Law
...that is, it is not limited to a precise calculation of the amount of actual pecuniary loss actually proved: Lonrho plc v Fayed (No 5)[1993] 1 WLR 1489 at 1494. His Honour took into consideration three categories of damages as a consequence of the defendants' conspiracy: (a) the expenses inc......
-
Never say 'never' for the truth can hurt: defamatory but true statements in the tort of simple conspiracy.
...impact on the public interest or serious harm to others would result if the defendants withheld those facts about the plaintiffs. (1) [1994] 1 All ER 188. (2) Ibid 192 (Dillon LJ). It was also alleged that the defendants financed an action brought against the plaintiffs by a third (3) Ibid ......