R v Apicella
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE LAWTON |
| Judgment Date | 28 November 1985 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1985] EWCA Crim J1128-3 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 3792/B/84 |
| Date | 28 November 1985 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
Indulis Lukstins V. Her Majesty's Advocate
... ... between statements made in response to police questioning and the recovery of real evidence which existed and could be verified independent of the will of the suspect ( Davidson v HM Advocate 1951 JC 33, LJ-C (Thomson) at 37; Adair v McGarry ( supra ), Lord Sands at 88-89; R v Apicella [1985] Crim App Rep 295, Lawton LJ at 298). A similar distinction was drawn by the European Court of Human Rights ( Saunders v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 313 at para 69; Jalloh v Germany (2007) 44 EHRR 32 at para 102). Although in Cowie , it had been submitted that once a person had ... ...
-
Maycock Sr. v The Superintendent of Prisons and the Attorney General
...Williams for the respondents. The appeal should be dismissed and the committal order made by the magistrate affirmed. Apicella (1985) 82 Cr. App. R. 295 applied Fox v. Gwent Chief Constable [1985] 1 W.L.R. 1126 applied Kuruma v. R [1955] A.C. 197 applied Neil v. North Antrim Magistrates' ......
- R v Christou ; R v Wright (Christopher)
-
Lockhart v the Superintendent of Prisons and the Attorney General
...Kristan Stubbs for the respondent. The appeal should be dismissed and the committal order made by the magistrate affirmed. Apicella (1985) 82 Cr. App. R. 295 applied Fox v. Gwent Chief Constable [1985] 1 W.L.R. 1126 applied Kuruma v. R [1955] A.C. 197 applied Neil v. North Antrim Magistra......
Request a trial to view additional results