R v Cairns

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE MANTELL
Judgment Date22 February 1999
Neutral Citation[1999] EWCA Crim J0222-6
Judgment citation (vLex)[1999] EWCA Crim J0222-14
Docket NumberNo: 98/6778/X5
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date22 February 1999

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • R v Martin (David Paul)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 20 December 1999
    ...The same subjective approach has been approved by this Court in cases of duress of circumstances or duress of necessity (see Cairns [1999] 2 Cr App R 137). We cannot see that any distinction should be made in a case of straightforward duress by threat. It follows that in our view the learn......
  • John McHugh (Administrator of the Estate of Christine McHugh (Deceased) v Ophelia Okai-Koi and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 31 March 2017
    ...to the defence of necessity, first, that the commission of the offence was necessary, or reasonably believed to have been necessary, R v Cairns [1999] 2 Cr App R 137 CA, R v Safi (Ali Ahmed) [2004] 1 Cr App R 14 CA, for the purpose of avoiding or preventing death or serious injury to the pe......
  • R v Robert COLIN ELSON
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 1 July 2004
    ...offence of dangerous driving is not something that we need to discuss in the light of our conclusions, but we note the case of Cairns [1999] 2 Cr App R 137.) 33 The appellant was not saying that he deliberately drove at the group. He was saying that it was an accident and that he had no int......
3 books & journal articles
  • Duress by indirect threats R v Brandford [2016] EWCA Crim 1794, [2017] 4 WLR 17, Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 81-2, April 2017
    • 1 April 2017
    ...EWCA Crim 1809, [2004] 1 Cr App R 14), firearms offences (Pommell;Gregory [2011]EWCA Crim 1712) and causing GBH with intent (Cairns [1999] 2 Cr App R 137). Several casesinvolve duress being invoked as a defence by those accused of drug dealing or trafficking, albeitrarely successfully. Exam......
  • When is it ‘Necessary’ to Protect a Person from Harassment?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 77-2, April 2013
    • 1 April 2013
    ...1 Cr App R 14). The ‘circum-stances’ do not have to actually exist; what is crucial is the defendant’sperception of them (R v Cairns [1999] 2 Cr App R 137). The perceiveddanger must be ‘such as he reasonably expects to follow immediately oralmost immediately on his failure’ to respond to it......
  • Non-conviction Bad Character Evidence and Directions to the Jury on Use to Show Propensity R v Mitchell [2016] UKSC 55
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 81-2, April 2017
    • 1 April 2017
    ...EWCA Crim 1809, [2004] 1 Cr App R 14), firearms offences (Pommell;Gregory [2011]EWCA Crim 1712) and causing GBH with intent (Cairns [1999] 2 Cr App R 137). Several casesinvolve duress being invoked as a defence by those accused of drug dealing or trafficking, albeitrarely successfully. Exam......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT