R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte Randle and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date15 November 1990
Date15 November 1990
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • Re Ashton; R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 May 1993
    ...and an order in a matter "relating to a trial on indictment" had been correct. In R v Central Criminal Court, Ex parte RandleWLR ((1991) 1 WLR 1087) and R v Norwich Crown Court, Ex parte BelshamWLR ((1992) 1 WLR 54) a distinction had been drawn between such an order and a stay on the ground......
  • Attorney General of Hong Kong v Wai-bun
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 29 March 1993
  • R v Chelmsford Crown Court, ex parte Chief Constable of Essex
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 June 1993
    ...that this court had power to intervene with a decision of the Crown Court on such a question. The first such decision was R. v. Central Criminal Court, ex parte Randle (1991) WLR 1087 in which this court decided it had such jurisdiction. That was followed by this court in a number of subseq......
  • R (Snelgrove) v Woolwich Crown Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 29 September 2004
    ...as an abuse of the process of the Court, and on a third on an application to quash an indictment. The first two were R v. Central Criminal Court, ex p Randle [1991] 1 WLR 1087, and R v. Norwich Crown Court, ex p Belsham [1992] 1 WLR 54 (both of which were later over-ruled by the House of Lo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT