R v Edward Brown (formerly Latham)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Fulford |
| Judgment Date | 29 July 2015 |
| Neutral Citation | [2015] EWCA Crim 1328 |
| Date | 29 July 2015 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | 201207170 C4,Case No: 201207170 C4 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
R (on the application of the Secretary of State for the Home Department) v First-Tier Tribunal (IAC) (Litigation privilege; First-Tier Tribunal)
...consider that the observations in ex p Gashi are not to be followed. 56 The interested party placed particular reliance on R v Brown [2015] EWCA Crim 1328 and McE v Prison Service of Northern Ireland [2009] UKHL 15. We do not consider that these cases are authority for the proposition that......
-
Mark Alan Holyoake v Nicholas Anthony Christopher Candy and Another
...at least of the basic premises that underlie LPP "would benefit from further examination." And she refers me to R v Brown (Edward) [2015] EWCA Crim 1328 [2016] 1 WLR 1141 where it was held that in exceptional circumstances the usually inviolable privilege attaching to legal advice was capa......
-
The Queen v Jason Garland
...by this court in R v. Noye [2011] EWCA Crim 650 at [25]–[31]; R v. O'Meally [2015] EWCA Crim 905 at [68]–[69]; R v. Edward Brown [2015] EWCA Crim 1328 at [43]–[46]; R v. Charlton and Ali [2016] EWCA Crim 52 at [112]–[113]. 52 We do not consider that there is any inconsistency between these ......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2018-06-22, [2018] UKUT 243 (IAC) (R (on the application of the Secretary of State for the Home Department) v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (Litigation Privilege; First-tier Tribunal))
...we consider that the observations in ex p Gashi are not to be followed. The interested party placed particular reliance on R v Brown [2015] EWCA Crim 1328 and McE v Prison Service of Northern Ireland [2009] UKHL 15. We do not consider that these cases are authority for the proposition that ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
A Confidential Consultation?
...in interpreting Brown to see whether Lord Justice Fulford’s prediction as to its limited application turns out to be true. 1 [2015] EWCA Crim 1328 2 Ibid, paragraph 7 3 Ibid, paragraph 41 4 R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2002] UKHL 21, [2003] 1 AC 563 [7]......
2 books & journal articles
-
Fresh Evidence and Factual Innocence in the Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal
...would or would not make of the evidence beyond all103. Ibid. at para. 35.104. [2011] EWCA Crim 650.105. [2015] EWCA Crim 905.106. [2015] EWCA Crim 1328.107. See, for example, RvDennis and others [2004] All ER (D) 05; RvAspery [2004] All ER (D) 183; RvJenkins [2004] All ER(D) 295; RvNawaz an......
-
Inappropriate Adults? A Review of the Current Use of Appropriate Adults in the Criminal Justice System
...also told Mr Ward about his right to have legal representation. Mr Ward then asked for a solicitor 27. Ibid [23].28. R v Edward Brown [2015] EWCA Crim 1328 [31].29. Ibid [41].30. Ibid Dent and O’Beirne 51 and the AA informed the Custody Sergeant. Whilst waiting for the solicitor to arrive, ......