R v J (JF)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Mr Justice Cranston,Mr Justice Leggatt |
Judgment Date | 24 April 2013 |
Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 569 |
Docket Number | No: 1205095 B5 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Date | 24 April 2013 |
To continue reading
Request your trial7 cases
-
R v Lama
...to view it (as most commentators do) as the leading authority, has been the subject of recent analysis by the Court of Appeal: R v. JFJ[2013] EWCA Crim 569. 109. For present purposes the most elementary of the principles laid down in Connelly has not been subject to any major dispute: It is......
-
Itzaz Nafeez Akhtar v The Queen
...same offence, the legal ingredients being different: see the explanation provided by Sir John Thomas P (as he then was) in R v J(F) [2013] EWCA Crim 569 when he explained: "It is well recognised that it is by no means easy to determine what the ratio in Connelly was … In our view the majori......
-
DPP v Tonie Jarman
...of the Act is entirely consistent with that conclusion. 23 If any support for that conclusion is needed it is to be found in R v (J) [2013] 2 Cr App R 10 at paragraph 57. In the absence of a statutory definition "dismiss" must be construed as an ordinary word and so it is synonymous with "d......
-
First Capital East Ltd v Ilmi Plana and Another
...acquit, but on broader considerations and the exercise of discretion whether or not permission should be granted. 48 In the recent case of R v J(JF) [2013] EWCA Crim 569, the Court of Appeal, presided over by the Lord Chief Justice, reviewed the law on double jeopardy and emphasised the nar......
Request a trial to view additional results