R v J (JF)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judge | Mr Justice Cranston,Mr Justice Leggatt |
| Judgment Date | 24 April 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 569 |
| Docket Number | No: 1205095 B5 |
| Date | 24 April 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
R v Lama
... ... , Ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) [ 2000 ] 1 AC 119 ; [ 1999 ] 2 WLR 272 ; [ 1999 ] 1 All ER 577 , HL(E) R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) [ 2000 ] 1 AC 147 ; [ 1999 ] 2 WLR 827 ; [ 1999 ] 2 All ER 97 , HL(E) R v J (JF) [2013] EWCA Crim 569 ; [ 2014 ] QB 561 ; [ 2014 ] 2 WLR 701 ; [ 2013 ] 2 Cr App R 10 , CA R v Madan [ 1961 ] 2 QB 1 ; [ 1961 ] 2 WLR 231 ; [ 1961 ] 1 All ER 588 ; 45 Cr App R 80 , CCA R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague ... ...
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Bird
...has no power to adjudicate: Donaldson LJ in R v Swansea Justices, Ex parte Purves (1981) 145 JD 252 at 254 a statement approved in R v J [2013] 2 Cr App R 10 by Sir John Thomas President of the Queens Bench Division at 45. Accordingly, there was no acquittal on the merits in this case. On 2......
-
DPP v Tonie Jarman
...of the Act is entirely consistent with that conclusion. 23 If any support for that conclusion is needed it is to be found in R v (J) [2013] 2 Cr App R 10 at paragraph 57. In the absence of a statutory definition "dismiss" must be construed as an ordinary word and so it is synonymous with "d......
-
R SY (by her Litigation Friend SP) v The Director of Public Prosecutions
...sense of justice and propriety.” 52 The reasoning behind these principles can be found in the Judgment of Sir John Thomas in R v J [2013] EWCA Crim 569: “There is no doubt about the fundamental principle that underpins the decision on this issue — a person is not to be harassed or prosecute......
Get Started for Free
