R v Jones (Wayne) ; R v WJ
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE AULD |
| Judgment Date | 06 June 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] EWCA Crim 1966 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 200106173/X3–200106616/X3 |
| Date | 06 June 2003 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
R v Petkar and another
...a further ground of appeal to be raised by both appellants, arising from the recent decision of this court in R v. Jones and Jenkins [2003] EWCA Crim 1966 (6 June 2003). At the close of the hearing we announced our decision that both appeals were dismissed with reasons to be reserved. We th......
-
R v Okuwa
...evidence of each defendant with caution, something which could have led to complaint. The appeal was dismissed. 103 In R. v. Jones [2004] 1 Cr. App. R. 5, the Court of Appeal quashed the Appellants’ convictions following a trial in which they ran “cut-throat” defences and in which the judge......
-
R v Joseph William Cross and Another
...examine each applicant's evidence with caution and look for independent supporting evidence. 17 One of the grounds of appeal in R v WJ [2004] 1 Cr App R 5 was that the judge had failed to warn the jury that the evidence of a co-defendant running a cut-throat defence should be treated with c......
-
R v Nadeem Khan and Barrington Allen and Adeel Khan
... ... He draws the court's attention to the decision in R v Jones and Jenkins [2004] 1 Cr.App.R 60 and, specifically, to a passage in the judgment of the court, which appears at page 68. There, the court set out ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Noticeboard
...form a reasonable basis for a definite conclusion. Warning about a co-defendant’s evidence—United Kingdom In R v Jones and Jenkins [2003] EWCA Crim 1966 the Court of Appeal said to Judicial Studies Board guidance) that where two co-defendants run cut-throat defences, including mirror-image ......