R v M and B
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Rix |
| Judgment Date | 11 December 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWCA Crim 2615 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 200902557 B5 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 11 December 2009 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
S v Masingili and Others
...(3d) 321): dictum in para 29 applied F R v Sappleton and Eubank 2010 ONSC 6132: compared. England Crown Prosecution Service v M & B [2009] EWCA Crim 2615: Legislation cited Statutes G The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, ss 12(1)(a), 35(3)(h) and 36: see Juta's Statutes o......
-
S v Masingili and Others
...(3d) 321): dictum in para 29 applied F R v Sappleton and Eubank 2010 ONSC 6132: compared. England Crown Prosecution Service v M & B [2009] EWCA Crim 2615: Legislation cited Statutes G The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, ss 12(1)(a), 35(3)(h) and 36: see Juta's Statutes o......
-
R v Farah Damji
...would not intend to punish a blameless individual and its status as a matter of “constitutional importance”, was re-asserted in CPS v M [2009] EWCA Crim 2615; [2010] 4 All ER 51 at 46 Here, by the inclusion of the words “without reasonable excuse”, s. 5(5) meets the inherent objection to pu......
-
R v Wayne Johnson
...he knew the package held pills and for S40C(1)(a) SIM cards. Its interpretation, the defence argued, was based on a particular reading of R v M [D]; "In the case of section 40C(1) (a) the defence would be, 'I honestly believed that I was not bringing it in', and the prosecution would have t......
1 books & journal articles
-
The art of deterrence: Singapore’s anti-money laundering regimes
...LJ in Msaid that: “Only a compellingcase for implying the exclusion of such an ingredient [mens rea]as a matterof necessity willsuffice”(M[2011] 1 WLR 822 at [23]).However, unlike the UK, this author was unableto find any case law in Singapore whichpresumes “mens rea”in statutoryprovisions. O......