R v Meachen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 05 August 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWCA Crim 1701 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2008/04940 C2 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 05 August 2009 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
R v Henderson and Others
...it was not necessary to hear the expert evidence in Butler. As is apparent in a trilogy of cases ( R v Stephen Jones [1997] 1 Cr App R 86, R v Meechan [2009] EWCA Crim 1701 and Kai-Whitewind) it is difficult to apply the provisions of that section to expert evidence. Where medical evidence ......
-
Burridge v R
...reflect on the acceptability of that opinion.” 97 This latter difficulty was also discussed in R v. Kai-Whitewind [2005] 2 Cr App R 31, R v. Meechan [2009] EWCA Crim 1701 and R v. Henderson [2010] EWCA Crim 1269 the latter of which underlined that a conviction can only be regarded as saf......
-
Ben Butler v The Crown
...it was not necessary to hear the expert evidence in Butler. As is apparent in a trilogy of cases ( R v Stephen Jones [1997] 1 Cr App R 86, R v Meechan [2009] EWCA Crim 1701 and Kai-Whitewind) it is difficult to apply the provisions of that section to expert evidence. Where medical evidence ......
-
Oladapo Oyediran v The Crown
...it was not necessary to hear the expert evidence in Butler. As is apparent in a trilogy of cases ( R v Stephen Jones [1997] 1 Cr App R 86, R v Meechan [2009] EWCA Crim 1701 and Kai-Whitewind) it is difficult to apply the provisions of that section to expert evidence. Where medical evidence ......
Request a trial to view additional results