R v Mohammed Khalique Zaman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Hickinbottom
Judgment Date2017
Neutral Citation[2017] EWCA Crim 1783
Docket NumberCase No: 201603723 B3
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Year2017
Date2017

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Mohammed Abdul Kuddus v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 Mayo 2019
    ...to the defendant following the breach of duty in question. The test is objective and prospective.” 34 To similar effect, in R v Zaman [2017] EWCA Crim 1783 the Court said at [24]: “The prosecution has to prove the following elements. (i) In accordance with the ordinary principles of neglig......
3 books & journal articles
  • Causing Death by Failing to Seek Medical Help: R v Broughton [2020] EWCA Crim 1093
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 85-1, February 2021
    • 1 Febrero 2021
    ...as 2017, the Court of Appeal in R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168; [2018] QB 328 (at [41],per Sir Brian Leveson P) and R v Zaman [2017] EWCA Crim 1783 (at [24], per Hickinbottom LJ) heldthat there were five elements to gross negligence manslaughter, viz (1) a duty of care; (2) a breach of that......
  • Gross Negligence Manslaughter, Restaurant Owners and the Duty of Care
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 82-3, June 2018
    • 1 Junio 2018
    ...DOI: 10.1177/0022018318779488 Owners and the Duty of Care journals.sagepub.com/home/clj R v Zaman [2017] EWCA Crim 1783 KeywordsHomicide, gross negligence manslaughter, food allergy, duty of care, breach of duty, Mohammed Zaman (Z) was a ‘highly experienced restaurateur’. He ran the Indian ......
  • Gross Negligence Manslaughter, Restaurant Owners and the Foreseeability Question: R v Kuddus [2019] EWCA Crim 837, Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 83-6, December 2019
    • 1 Diciembre 2019
    ...case confirms that restaurant owners like K owe a duty of care to their customers, a proposition first established in R v Zaman [2017] EWCA Crim 1783. The scope of that duty wasexplained in the present case (above). Leveson P also said That is the same as the duty placed [on optometrists] i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT