R v Morgan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Aikens
Judgment Date23 July 2016
Neutral Citation[2013] EWCA Crim 1307
Docket NumberCase No: 201202942 C5
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date23 July 2016

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • R (The Environment Agency) v Dean Andrew Ryder
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • August 21, 2020
    ...dispose of the waste lawfully and the costs which would have, inevitably, have gone with that.” After referring to the case of Morgan [2013] EWCA Crim 1307, [2014] 1 WLR 3450, he then went on: “I think this was my fault but we headed down a particular route involving the enforcement notic......
  • R v Jon Andrewes
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • August 7, 2020
    ...legitimately acquired assets to the extent that they are available for realisation. 28. The case of a defendant such as was considered in R v Morgan [2008] 4 All ER 890 is, however, a different one. To make a confiscation order in his case, when he has restored to the loser any proceeds of......
  • R v Higgins (Kevin)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • June 23, 2014
    ... ... It is, however, a submission which sits uneasily with the ruling of this court in R v Allingham [2012] NICA 29 (which is binding on this court unless decided per ... 4 incuriam) or the reasoning in R v Morgan [2013] EWCA 1307 (which being a decision of the English Court of Appeal is strongly persuasive). Factual background to the case [8] On 13 January 2004, 10 March 2004 and 24 February 2006, following receipt of complaints, officers of the Northern Ireland Environment Agency inspected land ... ...
  • R (London Borough of Islington) v Arun Bajaj
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • August 21, 2020
    ...to pay is capable, in an appropriate case, of being a pecuniary advantage within the ambit of s.76: see, by way of example, Morgan [2013] EWCA Crim 1307, [2014] 1 WLR 145. But in the present case the short point is that the respondent was under no lawful obligation to house these 12 occupa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT