R v Morris (Clarence Barrington)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE POTTER
Judgment Date22 October 1997
Judgment citation (vLex)[1997] EWCA Crim J1022-6
Date22 October 1997
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberNo. 9606870 X3

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • DPP v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 17 February 2006
    ...They are well-known. They include: R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498; R v Brown [1994] AC 212; R v Chan-Fook [1999] Cr App R 147; R v Morris (Clarence Barrington) [1998] Cr App R 386. The Justices received advice from their legal adviser that there was no case law which indicated that the cutting......
  • DPP v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
2 books & journal articles
  • Offences against the Person: Into the 21st Century
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-6, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...harm (not criminal), see J. E. Stannard, ‘Sticks, Stones and Words:Emotional Harm and English Criminal Law’ (2010) 74 JCL 533.18 [1998] 1 Cr App R 386.19 See Law Commission, Legislating the Criminal Code—Offences against the Person, LawCom. Report No. 218 (1993).The Journal of Criminal this......
  • Locating the Body in 'Bodily Harm'
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 45-2, July 2019
    • 1 July 2019
    ...thereby be capable of legal recognition in Qld and WA simply because of this change in wording. 11R v Clarence Barrington Morris [1998] 1 Cr App R 386, 393. The UK Law Commission recently described the term ‘actual bodily harm’ as being ‘hallowed by usage’ and having ‘boundaries [that] have......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT