R v Morris (Clarence Barrington)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE POTTER |
| Judgment Date | 22 October 1997 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1997] EWCA Crim J1022-6 |
| Docket Number | No. 9606870 X3 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 22 October 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
- DPP v Smith
-
DPP v Smith
...all, my Lord. 24 THE PRESIDENTR v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498; R v Brown [1994] AC 212; R v Chan-Fook [1999] Cr App R 147; R v Morris (Clarence Barrington) [1998] Cr App R 386. The Justices received advice from their legal adviser that there was no case law which indicated that the cutting off ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Offences against the Person: Into the 21st Century
...harm (not criminal), see J. E. Stannard, ‘Sticks, Stones and Words:Emotional Harm and English Criminal Law’ (2010) 74 JCL 533.18 [1998] 1 Cr App R 386.19 See Law Commission, Legislating the Criminal Code—Offences against the Person, LawCom. Report No. 218 (1993).The Journal of Criminal this......
-
Locating the Body in 'Bodily Harm'
...thereby be capable of legal recognition in Qld and WA simply because of this change in wording. 11R v Clarence Barrington Morris [1998] 1 Cr App R 386, 393. The UK Law Commission recently described the term ‘actual bodily harm’ as being ‘hallowed by usage’ and having ‘boundaries [that] have......