R v Pattison (Leslie)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE TOULSON
Judgment Date13 June 2007
Neutral Citation[2007] EWCA Crim 1536
Docket NumberNo: 2006/6359/B2
Date13 June 2007
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • R v Waya (Terry)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • November 14, 2012
    ...in R v Smith (David) [2002] 1 WLR 54, para 23. It was explored in detail by Toulson LJ giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal in R v Pattison [2007] EWCA Crim 1536, [2008] 1 Cr App R (S) 59 It is worth setting out one passage of Toulson LJ's judgment in full, since it explains the pos......
  • Terence John Hockey v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • June 14, 2017
    ...market value of the properties after deduction of the mortgage. He asserts that this was not new law as is clear from R v Pattinson [2007] EWCA Crim 1536, [2008] 1 Cr App R (S) 51: in fact, as he recognises, that case was decided on 13 June 2007, that is to say, the day after the appeal. In......
  • The Queen v John Lowther
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • October 29, 2020
    ...had been clarified. He could no longer assert that the prosecution were seeking to “have the penny and the sweet” (as Toulson LJ put it in R v Pattison, cited later in this 38 We are satisfied that this ground of appeal, in the case of each appellant, is unarguable and leave is refused. Rea......
  • Folarin Oyebola v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • July 23, 2013
    ...calculation, it is submitted that the case should be remitted to the Crown Court for re-determination. 36 Mr Cranston-Morris submits that R v Pattison [2007] EWCA Crim 1536, which is a non-criminal lifestyle case, is authority for the proposition that where property received by a defendant ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Valuing the Proceeds of Crime in Mortgage Fraud
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • January 26, 2011
    ...to remortgage. Such double counting would offend common sense. Toulson L.J. made the point clearly when he said in R v Pattison [2007] EWCA Crim 1536 (at paragraph 'Every school child knows that you cannot have the penny and the sweet. If your mother gives you a penny and you buy a sweet wi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT