R v Pattison (Leslie)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | LORD JUSTICE TOULSON |
Judgment Date | 13 June 2007 |
Neutral Citation | [2007] EWCA Crim 1536 |
Docket Number | No: 2006/6359/B2 |
Date | 13 June 2007 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
R v Waya (Terry)
...in R v Smith (David) [2002] 1 WLR 54, para 23. It was explored in detail by Toulson LJ giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal in R v Pattison [2007] EWCA Crim 1536, [2008] 1 Cr App R (S) 59 It is worth setting out one passage of Toulson LJ's judgment in full, since it explains the pos......
-
Terence John Hockey v The Queen
...market value of the properties after deduction of the mortgage. He asserts that this was not new law as is clear from R v Pattinson [2007] EWCA Crim 1536, [2008] 1 Cr App R (S) 51: in fact, as he recognises, that case was decided on 13 June 2007, that is to say, the day after the appeal. In......
-
The Queen v John Lowther
...had been clarified. He could no longer assert that the prosecution were seeking to “have the penny and the sweet” (as Toulson LJ put it in R v Pattison, cited later in this 38 We are satisfied that this ground of appeal, in the case of each appellant, is unarguable and leave is refused. Rea......
-
Folarin Oyebola v The Queen
...calculation, it is submitted that the case should be remitted to the Crown Court for re-determination. 36 Mr Cranston-Morris submits that R v Pattison [2007] EWCA Crim 1536, which is a non-criminal lifestyle case, is authority for the proposition that where property received by a defendant ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Valuing the Proceeds of Crime in Mortgage Fraud
...to remortgage. Such double counting would offend common sense. Toulson L.J. made the point clearly when he said in R v Pattison [2007] EWCA Crim 1536 (at paragraph 'Every school child knows that you cannot have the penny and the sweet. If your mother gives you a penny and you buy a sweet wi......