R v Rafferty (Andrew Paul)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE MAURICE KAY,LORD JUSTICE HOOPER
Judgment Date26 July 2007
Neutral Citation[2007] EWCA Crim 1846,[2007] EWCA Crim 865,[2007] EWCA Crim 1898
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date26 July 2007
Docket NumberCase No: 2006/02254 C2,No: 200602254/C2

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Dean Girdler v The Crown
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 5 November 2010
    ...32 Examples of new and intervening acts may be found in Kennedy [2007] UKHL 38; [2008] 1 AC 269; [2008] 1 Cr App R 19 and in Rafferty [2007] EWCA Crim 1846 (neither of which were cited in argument before us). Kennedy concerned the appellant's conviction for manslaughter in the following c......
  • R v Tas
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...387, SC(E), R v Johnson (Lewis) [2017] 4 WLR 104, CAand R v Brown (Cleon) [2017] EWCA Crim 1870, CA considered.R v Raf‌ferty (Andrew) [2007] EWCA Crim 1846, CA distinguished.APPEAL against conviction.On 9 August 2017, in the Central Criminal Court before Judge Leonard QC and a jury, Ali Tas......
  • R v André Campbell; R v Lloyd Henry; R v Jermaine Yateman
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 February 2009
    ...causation appropriately to the jury. Novus actus 33 There is a further point requires brief mention. We were referred to R v Rafferty [2007] EWCA Crim 1846 which was a case where death was caused by new and intervening event in a chain of events. It was submitted by the appellants that on a......
4 books & journal articles
  • Reform of Anglo-American Complicity Law: Conduct, Connectivity and Comparative Solutions
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...to mere predictive f‌iction412:deriving liability from an unforeseen potential outcome of that conduct is incoherent.413403. [2007] EWCA Crim. 1846; [2008] Crim. L.R. 218.404. See generally, Mitchell [N. 116], Kelman n (117); and Moriarty (n. 119).405. [2007] EWCA Crim. 1846, at 1853.406. S......
  • Kennedy and Unlawful Act Manslaughter: An Unorthodox Application of the Doctrine of Causation
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 72-5, October 2008
    • 1 October 2008
    ...appellant’s small action of elbowing the victim in the back did not23 Above n. 22 at 68.24 [1999] 1 AC 1.25 [2007] 3 All ER 396.26 [2007] EWCA Crim 1846 at [50].27 Ibid. at [27].The Journal of Criminal Law390 show any intention of serious harm, but it was easy to conclude thatRafferty’s act......
  • Reform of Anglo-American Complicity Law: Conduct, Connectivity and Comparative Solutions
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...to mere predictive f‌iction412:deriving liability from an unforeseen potential outcome of that conduct is incoherent.413403. [2007] EWCA Crim. 1846; [2008] Crim. L.R. 218.404. See generally, Mitchell [N. 116], Kelman n (117); and Moriarty (n. 119).405. [2007] EWCA Crim. 1846, at 1853.406. S......
  • Rape: Consent
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 72-1, February 2008
    • 1 February 2008
    ...harm. On this reasoning, murder is an offence ofbasic intent. Can this really be right?Ben FitzpatrickHomicide: CausationR v Rafferty [2007] EWCA Crim 1846The appellant had been convicted of manslaughter following the deathof the deceased, who had been the victim of a serious assault androb......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT