R v Ramzan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeMRS JUSTICE EBSWORTH,LORD JUSTICE MANTELL,Judge
Judgment Date06 March 1998
Judgment citation (vLex)[1998] EWCA Crim J0306-13
Docket NumberNo: 9703729/Y3
Date06 March 1998

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • R v Wayne Stephenson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 18 November 2003
    ...certainly to counsel to address the jury about this new approach to their verdict: see R v Cristini [1987] Crim LR 504 and R v Ramzan [1998] 2 Cr App R 328R v Cristini [1987] Crim LR 504 and R v Ramzan [1998] 2 Cr App R 328, at 336. 17 In the circumstances, having carried out an analysis of......
  • Hksar v Chan Kai Ming
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 14 December 2007
    ...had the magistrate convicted on a basis different from that of the case put forward by the prosecution as occurred in R. v. Ramzan [1998] 2 Cr. App. R. 328 and R. v. Taylor [1998] Cr. LR 582 and R. v. Gregory, 77 Cr. App. R. 23. There had been some cross examination of prosecution witnesses......
  • R Mullen and Another Large
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 20 May 2011
    ...v Warburton-Pitt (1991) 92 Cr App R 136 R v Harris (1993) The Times 22 March R v Gray and Evans [1998] Crim LR 570 CA R v Ramzan [1998] 2 Cr App R 328[1984] AC 242 HL R v Lunn [1985] Crim LR 797 CA R v Cristini [1987] Crim LR 504 CA R v White [1987] Crim LR 505 R v Warburton-Pitt (1991) 9......
  • R v M.K.
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 17 January 2003
    ...Is it necessary to for us to give you a representation order on that? 59 If your Lordships would consider it. LORD JUSTICE POTTERR v Ramzan [1998] 2 Cr App R 328 in which, giving the judgment of the Court, Ebsworth J stated at page 336: "This appeal underlines the problems which may arise i......
1 books & journal articles
  • Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 63-5, October 1999
    • 1 October 1999
    ...314R v Pitt [1998] 1 Cr App R (5) 52214R v Radak and ors [1999] 1 Cr App R187 343R vRamzan(1998) 2 Cr App R 328 126R vRichards(1999) 163 JP 246434R vRichardson[1998] 2 Cr App R20023R vRichardsonand Irwin [1999] 1 Cr AppR 392463R vRobertsand another (1998) Crim LR682 212R v S(Paul John) [199......