R v Sissen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 08 December 2000 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2000] EWCA Crim J1208-13 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 00/2782/Z2 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 08 December 2000 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov
... ... 80 The Rome Regulations are, however, directly effective in the United Kingdom and form part of UK law. As part of domestic law they naturally fall within the term enactmentsee, for example, R v Sissen [ 2001 ] 1 WLR 902 in which a European regulation was held to be an enactment for the purposes of section 170(2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979. 81 There is also support in the authorities for the argument that in this context it is sufficient if the enactment does not ... ...
-
R v Bajwa and Others
...of St Marylebone in R v Smith [1975] AC 476, but the correctness of the principal analysis and the decision in Green was not doubted. In R v Sissen [2001] 1 WLR 902, this court followed the principles set out by Ormrod LJ quoted at [59] above in the context of a charge under section 170(2)(......
-
BAV-TMW-Globaler-Immobilien Spezialfonds
...contexts, “enactment” has been given a broader meaning to cover other kinds of instrument. As an example, the authors cite R v Sissen [2001] 1 WLR 902 in which EU Council Regulations were held to be enactments for the purposes of section 170(2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979.......
-
R v Nicholas Noonan
...drew attention, as the judge had had his attention drawn, to one of the few authorities in this court, dealing with this type of case, R v Sissen, a decision of this court of 8th December 2000. The judge acknowledged in his sentencing remarks that that case was different because it concerne......