Sadler v Great Western Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 11 May 1896 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1896] UKHL J0511-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 11 May 1896 |
[1896] UKHL J0511-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel for the Appellant, as well on Friday last as this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of Frederick Sadler, of No. 268, Strand, in the County of Middlesex, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 25th of October 1895, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Great Western Railway Company, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the said Respondents, but not called on; and due consideration had of what was offered for the said Appellant:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 25th of October 1895, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed; and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellant do pay, or cause to be paid, to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The Society of The Governor and Assistants, London, of The New Plantation in Ulster Within The Realm of Ireland, Mart Moore, Fanny E. Corsoaden, Eva G. H. McOorkell, Frederick Ritter, Jane Ritter, Alfred Moore Munn, and HM Attorney-General for Ireland (At The Relation of The Aforesaid Plaintiffs) v Richard M. Fleming, Edward Harold, Philip O'Doherty, Edward McDaid, John McColgan, Thomas Reynolds, John Barr, and John McDermott
...452. (3) [1900] A. C. 403. (4) 6 Mod. 73. (1) 2 Ex. D. 63. (2) L. R. 8 Ch. App. 650. (3) [1894] 3 Ch. 163. (4) 57 L. T. (N. S.) 522. (5) [1896] A. C. 450. (6) [1907] 1 K. B. (1) 3 Ridg. P. C. 267. (2) 8 Ir. L. R. 122, note. (3) 7 East, 195. (4) 8 A. & E. 314. (5) Long. & T. 601. (6) 19 L. R......
-
Baxter v Obacelo Pty Ltd
...574 at 603–604 per Gummow J; Bryanston Finance Ltd v de Vries [1975] QB 703 at 730 per Lord Diplock. 7Sadler v Great Western Railway Co [1896] AC 450 at 454 per Lord Halsbury 8Wah Tat Bank Ltd v Chan [1975] AC 507 at 515. 9XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (1985) 1......
-
Newcrest Mining Ltd v Thornton
...574 at 603-604 per Gummow J; Bryanston Finance Ltd v de Vries [1975] QB 703 at 730 per Lord Diplock. 83Sadler v Great Western Railway Co [1896] AC 450 at 454 per Lord Halsbury LC. 84Wah Tat Bank Ltd v Chan [1975] AC 507 at 515. 85XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (......
-
Newcrest Mining Ltd v Thornton
...574 at 603-604 per Gummow J; Bryanston Finance Ltd v de Vries [1975] QB 703 at 730 per Lord Diplock. 83Sadler v Great Western Railway Co [1896] AC 450 at 454 per Lord Halsbury LC. 84Wah Tat Bank Ltd v Chan [1975] AC 507 at 515. 85XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (......