Subhash Mehta v R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Toulson |
| Judgment Date | 31 December 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWCA Crim 2824 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201200441 C3 |
| Date | 31 December 2012 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
R v Nathan Reid and Another
...defective. Toulson LJ giving the judgment said that legal principles have been analysed in more than one case, most recently Mehta [2012] EWCA Crim 2824. It is unnecessary here to rehearse them, they are set out in paragraph 18 onwards in his judgment. 19 In this case the Crown's argument a......
-
Andris Linuzs and Others v Latmar Holdings Corporation
...parties to the wider conspiracy. (For this general principle see the well known case of R v Griffiths [1966] 1 QB 589, recently cited in R v Mehta [2012] EWCA Crim 2824). Mr Khurshid submitted that on the material before the court this is such a case, and that there is no good arguable ca......
-
Waqar Bhatti and Others v R
...doing the same thing with Middlesex College in pursuance of the same criminal purpose that he had in mind. The principles are set out in R v Mehta [2012] EWCA Crim 282 at paragraphs 36–37. 25 On this basis the Judge rejected the Defence submission that count 1 charged as a single conspiracy......
-
R v Emmanuel Thompson
...of some basic principles relating to the offence of conspiracy. They can be derived from the decision of this Court in R v Mehta [2012] EWCA Crim 2824. First, the essence of the offence is an agreement between at least two persons. If the prosecution cannot prove that an accused has made an......
Request a trial to view additional results