Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE VICE CHANCELLOR |
| Judgment Date | 06 July 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Civ 906,[2004] EWCA Civ 858 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Date | 06 July 2004 |
| Docket Number | B2/2003/2662 |
[2004] EWCA Civ 906
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE READING COUNTY COURT
(HIS HONOUR JUDGE CATLIN)
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London, WC2
The Vice Chancellor
Sir Andrew Morritt
Lord Justice Clarke
Lord Justice Sedley
B2/2003/2662
MISS YVETTE GENN (instructed by Irwin Mitchell) appeared on behalf of the Claimant/Respondent
MR IAIN DANIELS (instructed by Barlow Lyde & Gilbert) appeared on behalf of the Defendant/Appellant
Tuesday, 6th July 2004
Having considered the written and oral submissions, the order we make as to costs is that the successful appellant should have his costs as to 50 per cent of the trial; as to 50 per cent of the appeal. The order is not to be enforced against the respondent personally without the further leave of the court and we invite counsel to ascertain and put into the form of order to be agreed by them and lodged with the associate whatever is the appropriate form to enable orders in due course to be made for the recovery of costs by the appellant out of the Legal Services Commission fund.
Thank you.
Orders:
Appellant to have costs 50 per cent of trial, 50 per cent of appeal.
Not to be enforced without further leave of the Court.
Counsel to lodge order with Associate.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kelly Minio-Paluello v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
...upon a number of authorities including Wilson v Chief Constable of Lancashire Constabulary (2000) CA (unreported) and Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2004] EWCA Civ 858, [2004] 1 WLR 3155. As stated in particular at paragraph 26 of the judgement of Clarke LJ in Taylor, "…......
-
Satish Chatwani and Others v The National Crime Agency and Another
...which he can understand ( Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573 at page 593 per Lord Simonds, recently confirmed in (e.g.) Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2004] EWCA Civ 858 at [30] per Clarke LJ (as he then was); the common law position now being fortified by article 5(2) o......
-
Paul Charles Andrews v The Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary
...on Saturday, which was the 10th June 2017. 29. Notwithstanding this, Ms Morris submits that s28(3) is not met. 30. In Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2004] 1 WLR 3155 the Court of Appeal in a case involving an offence of violent disorder held that the requirements of s28(......
-
R (Sher) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester
...arrested: see Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573, 593. What is sufficient depends on the circumstances of each case; see Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley [2004] 1 WLR 3155. That is reflected in Article 5.2 of the Convention which requires that: “Everyone who is arrested shall be i......