Communications in UK Law
-
Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
... ... Suffice to say, Braddock v. Bevins did not place election communications into a special category ... 30 In Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1993] A.C. 534 this House held that ... ...
-
Easy Air Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd
... ... to say that COMUGs were illegal, and relied on a decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) in Floe Telecom Ltd v Office of Communications [2006] CAT 17 ... That case concerned (among other things) the interpretation of a licence granted to Vodafone. The CAT decided that, on the true ... ...
-
Lee Victor Addlesee (and the others listed in the Schedule annexed to the Amended Claim Form) v Dentons Europe LLP
... ... It is: what happens to legal advice privilege attaching to communications between a company and its lawyers, once that company has been dissolved; and the Crown has disclaimed all interest in its former property? ... 2 ... ...
-
Balabel v Air India
... ... Boardly, the issue is whether such privilege extends only to communications seeking or conveying legal advice, or to all that passes between solicitor and client on matters within the ordinary business of a solicitor ... ...
-
Lloyds Bowmaker Ltd v Britannia Arrow Holdings Plc
... ... Lavens (T/A Commend Communications)(by original action) Britannia Arrow Holdings PLC and Lloyds Bowmaker Limited and A.G. Lavens (T/A ... ...
-
Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc. [ChD]
... ... Corporation [1955] 2 QB 327 at 334 , approved in Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl [1983] 2 AC 34 a 41–2 (in the case of instantaneous communications the contract is made where the acceptance is received the contract was made in California). Corps puts the final events the other way round – Mr ... ...
-
Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
... ... In such cases, the occasion prevents the inference of malice, which the law draws from unauthorised communications, and affords a qualified defence depending upon the absence of actual malice. If fairly warranted by any reasonable occasion or exigency, and ... ...
-
R (Edwards) v Environment Agency (No. 2)
... ... Otherwise the publicity requirements of regulation 29 could be evaded by secret communications between the applicant and the Agency ... 41 As I have said, I doubt the factual basis for the allegation that significant ... ...
-
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation
... ... The Plaintiffs say that the contract was made by Telex between the Dutch company in Amsterdam and the English company in London. Communications by Telex are comparatively new. Each company has a teleprinter machine in its office; and each has a Telex number like a telephone number. When one ... ...
-
Minter v Priest
... ... 2 The privilege claimed is that which covers communications between a solicitor and his client, a privilege the maintenance of which is essential in the best interests of society; the examination, therefore, ... ...
See all results