Communications in UK Law

  • Attorney General of Belize and Others v Belize Telecom and another
    • Privy Council
    • 18 March 2009
    ...... Appeal No 19 of 2006 (1) Attorney General of Belize (2) ECOM Limited (3) Belize Telecommunications Limited Appellants and (1) Belize Telecom Limited (2) Innovative Communication Company LLC ......
  • Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 28 October 1999
    ......Suffice to say, Braddock v. Bevins did not place election communications into a special category. . 30 In Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1993] A.C. 534 this House held that it ......
  • Easy Air Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 08 April 2009
    ...... was enforced by requiring subscribers to sign a form confirming that the SIM cards issued to them would be used exclusively for telecommunications traffic generated by them during the normal course of business and that they accepted the policy. . . 16 12. In September 2004 O2 ......
  • Lloyds Bowmaker Ltd v Britannia Arrow Holdings Plc
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 March 1987
    ......Lavens (T/A Commend Communications)(by original action) Britannia Arrow Holdings PLC and Lloyds Bowmaker Limited and A.G. Lavens (T/A ......
  • Balabel v Air India
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 March 1988
    ......Boardly, the issue is whether such privilege extends only to communications seeking or conveying legal advice, or to all that passes between solicitor and client on matters within the ordinary business of a solicitor. ......
  • Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 05 December 2001
    ......In such cases, the occasion prevents the inference of malice, which the law draws from unauthorised communications, and affords a qualified defence depending upon the absence of actual malice. If fairly warranted by any reasonable occasion or exigency, and ......
  • AT&T Knowledge Ventures & CVON Innovations v The Comptroller General General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 03 March 2009
    ...... of hardware: a user terminal belonging to the transmitter of the message; a user terminal belonging to its recipient, a mobile telecommunications network, and a third party database server which contains details of the members of the group in question. CVON make no claim to the scheme per se. ......
  • Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc. [ChD]
    • Chancery Division
    • 07 April 2004
    ...... forth in section 1.3 herein and to reserve for Apple Computers field of use for its Trade Marks, the computer, data processing and telecommunications business as set forth in section 1.2 herein and to coordinate the use of their respective Trade Marks in such fields of use as set forth in section 4 ......
  • Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 08 July 1998
    ...... and Neill on Defamation (2nd edn) paragraphs 14.04 —14.05 as follows:- "From the broad general principle that certain communications should be protected by qualified privilege in `the general interest of society' the courts have developed the concept that there must exist between ......
  • R (Edwards) v Environment Agency (No. 2)
    • House of Lords
    • 16 April 2008
    ......Otherwise the publicity requirements of regulation 29 could be evaded by secret communications between the applicant and the Agency. . . 41 As I have said, I doubt the factual basis for the allegation that significant new ......
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT