Education Law in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah
    • House of Lords
    • 16 Diciembre 1982

    Unless, therefore, it can be shown that the statutory framework or the lesal context in which the words are used requires a different meaning, I unhesitatingly subscribe to the view that "ordinarily resident" refers to a man's abode in a particular place or country which he has adopted voluntarily and for settled purposes as part of the regular order of his life for the time being, whether of short or long duration.

    This is not to say that the "propositus" intends to stay where he is indefinitely; indeed his purpose, while settled, may be for a limited period. Education, business or profession, employment, health, family, or merely love of the place spring to mind as common reasons for a choice of regular abode. All that is necessary is that the purpose of living where one does has a sufficient degree of continuity to be properly described as settled.

  • R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 Noviembre 1981

    If we were to do that here, I feel I would apply the test submitted by Mr. Lester. The words "ordinarily resident" mean that the person must be habitually and normally resident here, apart from temporary or occasional absences of long or short duration. On that test all those students would qualify for a mandatory award.

  • MK (Best Interests of Child) India
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 30 Noviembre 2011

    If, at the other extreme, all the factors of relevance to the best interests of the child consideration (save for the child's and/or parent(s) own claim that they want to remain) point overwhelmingly to the child's interests being best served by him returning with his parent(s) to his country of origin (or to one of his parents being expelled leaving him to remain living here), then very little by way of countervailing considerations to do with immigration control etc. may be necessary in order for the conclusion to be drawn that the decision appealed against was and is proportionate.

  • R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 15 Junio 2004

    What to my mind is abundantly clear is that the Defendant earnestly and sincerely wanted the Claimant to attend school. The Claimant had a choice, either of returning to school wearing the school uniform or of refusing to wear the school uniform knowing that if she did so refuse the Defendant was unlikely to allow her to attend. In my judgment it cannot be said the actions or stance of the school amounted to exclusion, either formal, informal, unofficial or in any way whatsoever.

  • R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, ex parte Begbie
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 Agosto 1999

    In some cases a change of tack by a public authority, though unfair from the applicant's stance, may involve questions of general policy affecting the public at large or a significant section of it (including interests not represented before the court); here the judges may well be in no position to adjudicate save at most on a bare Wednesbury basis, without themselves donning the garb of policy-maker, which they cannot wear. In some cases a change of tack by a public authority, though unfair from the applicant's stance, may involve questions of general policy affecting the public at large or a significant section of it (including interests not represented before the court); here the judges may well be in no position to adjudicate save at most on a bare Wednesbury basis, without themselves donning the garb of policy-maker, which they cannot wear. In some cases a change of tack by a public authority, though unfair from the applicant's stance, may involve questions of general policy affecting the public at large or a significant section of it (including interests not represented before the court); here the judges may well be in no position to adjudicate save at most on a bare Wednesbury basis, without themselves donning the garb of policy-maker, which they cannot wear.

  • Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Company Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 13 Diciembre 1950

See all results
Legislation
  • Higher Education and Research Act 2017
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 de Enero de 2017
  • Deregulation Act 2015
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 de Enero de 2015
    ......(i) are fit and proper persons to act as insolvency practitioners, and. . . (ii) meet acceptable requirements as to education and practical training and experience. . . . (5) The Secretary of State may make an order revoking an order under subsection (1) or (2) in ......
  • Additional Learning Needs and Education Tribunal (Wales) Act 2018
    • Wales
    • 1 de Enero de 2018
  • Data Protection Act 2018
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 de Enero de 2018
    ...... (3) Schedule 3 makes provision restricting the application of rules contained in Articles 13 to 21 of the GDPR to health, social work, education and child abuse data, as allowed for by Article 23(1) of the GDPR. . (4) Schedule 4 makes provision restricting the application of rules contained ......
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results
Forms
  • Chapter CCPG11020
    • HMRC Guidance manuals
    • Formularios de Derecho Civil, Mercantil y Registral
    • HM Revenue & Customs
    ......HMRC is there to help and support those who want to be compliant in their International Trade activity and we will offer support, education and advice to those who have made an error through lack of knowledge or understanding. However, we will consider taking Customs Civil Penalty (CCP) ......
  • Chapter EIM32525
    • HMRC Guidance manuals
    • Formularios de Derecho Civil, Mercantil y Registral
    ...... . No deduction should normally be permitted under Section 336 ITEPA 2003 for expenses incurred by an employee for external education. This is so even where the subject of the education is closely relevant to the nature of the employment. The expenses are not deductible because they ......
  • Chapter IHTM36061
    • HMRC Inheritance Tax Manual
    • HM Revenue & Customs
    ......The standard of reasonableness can vary according, for example, to the type, education and background of the taxpayer concerned. But you should bear in mind that the law gives ample time for taxpayers to complete and deliver an IHT ......
  • Notice of attendance of authorised lawyer
    • HM Courts & Tribunals Service court and tribunal forms
    Family forms including the form to apply for a non-molestation order or an occupation order (Form FL401).
    ......audience in the family court; or. a lawyer working for the Law School, Faculty or Department of a Higher Education Institution. designated as a recognised body pursuant to section 216 of the Education Reform Act 1988; or. a lawyer attending on behalf of a ......
See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT